lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 11 Sep 2020 14:32:17 +0200
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To:     Divya Koppera <Divya.Koppera@...rochip.com>
Cc:     hkallweit1@...il.com, linux@...linux.org.uk, davem@...emloft.net,
        kuba@...nel.org, marex@...x.de, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next] net: phy: mchp: Add support for LAN8814 QUAD
 PHY

On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 11:40:20AM +0530, Divya Koppera wrote:
> LAN8814 is a low-power, quad-port triple-speed (10BASE-T/100BASETX/1000BASE-T)
> Ethernet physical layer transceiver (PHY). It supports transmission and
> reception of data on standard CAT-5, as well as CAT-5e and CAT-6, unshielded
> twisted pair (UTP) cables.
> 
> LAN8814 supports industry-standard QSGMII (Quad Serial Gigabit Media
> Independent Interface) and Q-USGMII (Quad Universal Serial Gigabit Media
> Independent Interface) providing chip-to-chip connection to four Gigabit
> Ethernet MACs using a single serialized link (differential pair) in each
> direction.
> 
> The LAN8814 SKU supports high-accuracy timestamping functions to
> support IEEE-1588 solutions using Microchip Ethernet switches, as well as
> customer solutions based on SoCs and FPGAs.
> 
> The LAN8804 SKU has same features as that of LAN8814 SKU except that it does
> not support 1588, SyncE, or Q-USGMII with PCH/MCH.
> 
> This adds support for 10BASE-T, 100BASE-TX, and 1000BASE-T,
> QSGMII link with the MAC.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Divya Koppera<divya.koppera@...rochip.com>

Hi Divya

I don't think V1 got merged. So you need to squash this into V1, so
you still add the new PHY, but without these callbacks.

    Andrew

Powered by blists - more mailing lists