[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200911191612.GH1551@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2020 20:16:12 +0100
From: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, andrew@...n.ch,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: mvpp2: Initialize link in
mvpp2_isr_handle_{xlg,gmac_internal}
On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 09:01:01AM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 08:22:36AM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Fri, 11 Sep 2020 12:11:58 +0100 Russell King - ARM Linux admin wrote:
> > > On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 05:31:42PM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> > > > Ah great, that is indeed cleaner, thank you for letting me know!
> > >
> > > Hmm, I'm not sure why gcc didn't find that. Strangely, the 0-day bot
> > > seems to have only picked up on it with clang, not gcc.
> >
> > May be similar to: https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/2/25/1092
> >
> > Recent GCC is so bad at catching uninitialized vars I was considering
> > build testing with GCC8 :/
>
> It is even simpler than that, the warning was straight up disabled in
> commit 78a5255ffb6a ("Stop the ad-hoc games with -Wno-maybe-initialized").
Great, so now rather than getting false positive warnings, we now
get buggy code. That sounds like a good improvement to me.
Not.
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 40Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists