[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMo8Bf+r3YvWewdHzg=Y4mFspYLA3GrJ04rry90deYsWN_gZRA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2020 12:58:56 -0700
From: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@...il.com>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: "open list:TENSILICA XTENSA PORT (xtensa)"
<linux-xtensa@...ux-xtensa.org>, Chris Zankel <chris@...kel.net>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] xtensa: add seccomp support
On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 12:38 PM Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 18, 2020 at 07:16:51PM -0700, Max Filippov wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > this series adds support for seccomp filter on xtensa and updates
> > selftests/seccomp.
>
> Hi!
>
> Firstly, thanks for adding seccomp support! :) I would, however, ask
> that you CC maintainers on these kinds of changes for feedback. I was
> surprised to find the changes in the seccomp selftests today in Linus's
> tree. I didn't seem to get CCed on this series, even though
> get_maintainers shows this:
>
> $ ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl 0001-selftests-seccomp-add-xtensa-support.mbox
> Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> (supporter:SECURE COMPUTING)
> Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net> (reviewer:SECURE COMPUTING)
> Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org> (reviewer:SECURE COMPUTING)
> Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org> (maintainer:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK)
> ...
Sorry about that. Looks like I've filtered out too much of the cc: list.
I'll fix my workflow.
> Regardless, I'm still glad to have more arch support! :) I'll send a
> follow-up patch to refactor a bit of the selftest.
--
Thanks.
-- Max
Powered by blists - more mailing lists