netdev - Re: [RFC PATCH net-next v1 11/11] drivers/net/ethernet: clean up mis-targeted comments

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200911144207.00005619@intel.com>
Date:   Fri, 11 Sep 2020 14:42:07 -0700
From:   Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>
To:     Edward Cree <ecree@...arflare.com>
Cc:     <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next v1 11/11] drivers/net/ethernet: clean up
 mis-targeted comments

Edward Cree wrote:
> On 11/09/2020 02:23, Jesse Brandeburg wrote:
> > + * @MC_CMD_PTP_IN_TRANSMIT_LENMAX: hack to get W=1 to compile

> I think I'd rather have a bogus warning than bogus kerneldocto suppress it;
>  please drop this line (and encourage toolchain folks to figure out how to
>  get kerneldoc to ignore macros it can't understand).
> Apart from that, the sfc and sfc/falcon parts LGTM.
> 
> -ed

Thanks Ed, I think I might just remove the /** on that function then
(removing it from kdoc processing), would that be acceptable in the
meantime? Of course I'd remove the line I added as well.

- Jesse