[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200911154629.0e2077c0@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2020 15:46:29 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Michael Chan <michael.chan@...adcom.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, mkubecek@...e.cz,
tariqt@...dia.com, saeedm@...dia.com,
Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 5/8] bnxt: add pause frame stats
On Fri, 11 Sep 2020 15:43:43 -0700 Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > > + struct bnxt *bp = netdev_priv(dev);
> > > + struct rx_port_stats *rx_stats;
> > > + struct tx_port_stats *tx_stats;
> > > +
> > > + if (BNXT_VF(bp) || !(bp->flags & BNXT_FLAG_PORT_STATS))
> > > + return;
> > > +
> > > + rx_stats = (void *)bp->port_stats.sw_stats;
> > > + tx_stats = (void *)((unsigned long)bp->port_stats.sw_stats +
> > > + BNXT_TX_PORT_STATS_BYTE_OFFSET);
> > > +
> > > + epstat->rx_pause_frames = rx_stats->rx_pause_frames;
> > > + epstat->tx_pause_frames = tx_stats->tx_pause_frames;
> >
> > This will work, but the types on the 2 sides don't match. On the
> > right hand side, since you are casting to the hardware struct
> > rx_port_stats and tx_port_stats, the types are __le64.
> >
> > If rx_stats and tx_stats are *u64 and you use these macros:
> >
> > BNXT_GET_RX_PORT_STATS64(rx_stats, rx_pause_frames)
> > BNXT_GET_TX_PORT_STATS64(tx_stats, tx_pause_frames)
> >
> > the results will be the same with native CPU u64 types.
>
> Thanks! My build bot just poked me about this as well.
>
> I don't see any byte swaps in bnxt_get_ethtool_stats() -
> are they not needed there? I'm slightly confused.
Oof those macros don't byte swap either, even more confused now :)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists