[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOMdWSKMc1HDgmeWaqp1Z+kniNNE1Es9PLLo-3b1PwCrjKLw6A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2020 15:30:41 +0530
From: Allen <allen.lkml@...il.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: jes@...ined-monkey.org, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
dougmill@...ux.ibm.com, cooldavid@...ldavid.org,
mlindner@...vell.com, stephen@...workplumber.org,
borisp@...lanox.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Romain Perier <romain.perier@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/20] ethernet: alteon: convert tasklets to use new
tasklet_setup() API
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > -static void ace_tasklet(unsigned long arg)
> >> > +static void ace_tasklet(struct tasklet_struct *t)
> >> > {
> >> > - struct net_device *dev = (struct net_device *) arg;
> >> > - struct ace_private *ap = netdev_priv(dev);
> >> > + struct ace_private *ap = from_tasklet(ap, t, ace_tasklet);
> >> > + struct net_device *dev = (struct net_device *)((char *)ap -
> >> > + ALIGN(sizeof(struct net_device), NETDEV_ALIGN));
> >> > int cur_size;
> >> >
> >>
> >> I don't see this is as an improvement. The 'dev' assignment looks so
> >> incredibly fragile and exposes so many internal details about netdev
> >> object allocation, alignment, and layout.
> >>
> >> Who is going to find and fix this if someone changes how netdev object
> >> allocation works?
> >>
> >
> > Thanks for pointing it out. I'll see if I can fix it to keep it simple.
>
> Just add a backpointer to the netdev from the netdev_priv() if you
> absolutely have too.
>
How does this look?
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/alteon/acenic.c
b/drivers/net/ethernet/alteon/acenic.c
index 8470c836fa18..1a7e4df9b3e9 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/alteon/acenic.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/alteon/acenic.c
@@ -465,6 +465,7 @@ static int acenic_probe_one(struct pci_dev *pdev,
SET_NETDEV_DEV(dev, &pdev->dev);
ap = netdev_priv(dev);
+ ap->ndev = dev;
ap->pdev = pdev;
ap->name = pci_name(pdev);
@@ -1562,10 +1563,10 @@ static void ace_watchdog(struct net_device
*data, unsigned int txqueue)
}
-static void ace_tasklet(unsigned long arg)
+static void ace_tasklet(struct tasklet_struct *t)
{
- struct net_device *dev = (struct net_device *) arg;
- struct ace_private *ap = netdev_priv(dev);
+ struct ace_private *ap = from_tasklet(ap, t, ace_tasklet);
+ struct net_device *dev = ap->ndev;
int cur_size;
cur_size = atomic_read(&ap->cur_rx_bufs);
@@ -2269,7 +2270,7 @@ static int ace_open(struct net_device *dev)
/*
* Setup the bottom half rx ring refill handler
*/
- tasklet_init(&ap->ace_tasklet, ace_tasklet, (unsigned long)dev);
+ tasklet_setup(&ap->ace_tasklet, ace_tasklet);
return 0;
}
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/alteon/acenic.h
b/drivers/net/ethernet/alteon/acenic.h
index c670067b1541..265fa601a258 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/alteon/acenic.h
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/alteon/acenic.h
@@ -633,6 +633,7 @@ struct ace_skb
*/
struct ace_private
{
+ struct net_device *ndev; /* backpointer */
struct ace_info *info;
struct ace_regs __iomem *regs; /* register base */
struct ace_skb *skb;
@@ -776,7 +777,7 @@ static int ace_open(struct net_device *dev);
static netdev_tx_t ace_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb,
struct net_device *dev);
static int ace_close(struct net_device *dev);
-static void ace_tasklet(unsigned long dev);
+static void ace_tasklet(struct tasklet_struct *t);
static void ace_dump_trace(struct ace_private *ap);
static void ace_set_multicast_list(struct net_device *dev);
static int ace_change_mtu(struct net_device *dev, int new_mtu);
Let me know what you think.
Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists