[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1600070567.2534.3.camel@suse.de>
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2020 10:02:47 +0200
From: Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.de>
To: Allen Pais <allen.lkml@...il.com>, davem@...emloft.net
Cc: m.grzeschik@...gutronix.de, kuba@...nel.org, paulus@...ba.org,
woojung.huh@...rochip.com, UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com,
petkan@...leusys.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-ppp@...r.kernel.org,
Allen Pais <apais@...ux.microsoft.com>,
Romain Perier <romain.perier@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RESEND net-next v2 12/12] net: usbnet: convert tasklets to use
new tasklet_setup() API
Am Montag, den 14.09.2020, 13:01 +0530 schrieb Allen Pais:
> From: Allen Pais <apais@...ux.microsoft.com>
>
> In preparation for unconditionally passing the
> struct tasklet_struct pointer to all tasklet
> callbacks, switch to using the new tasklet_setup()
> and from_tasklet() to pass the tasklet pointer explicitly
> and remove the .data field.
Hi,
how would bisecting be supposed to run smoothly, if this
patch were applied? We'd pass a NULL pointer.
Regards
Oliver
Powered by blists - more mailing lists