lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2020 16:21:22 -0400 From: Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org> To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> Cc: nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com, davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, paulmck@...nel.org, josh@...htriplett.org, peterz@...radead.org, christian.brauner@...ntu.com, rcu@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, sfr@...b.auug.org.au, roopa@...dia.com Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] rcu: prevent RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN() from swallowing the condition On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 05:27:51PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Tue, 08 Sep 2020 21:15:56 +0300 nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com wrote: > > Ah, you want to solve it for all. :) > > Looks and sounds good to me, > > Reviewed-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com> > > Actually, I give up, lockdep_is_held() is not defined without > CONFIG_LOCKDEP, let's just go with your patch.. Care to send a patch just for the RCU macro then? Not sure what Dave is applying but if the net-next tree is not taking the RCU macro change, then send another one with my tag: Reviewed-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@...lfernandes.org> thanks! - Joel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists