[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <57efff54-7aa4-8220-c705-1fdf35b0099e@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2020 17:59:11 +0100
From: Alex Dewar <alex.dewar90@...il.com>
To: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>
Cc: "linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
"ath10k@...ts.infradead.org" <ath10k@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"kvalo@...eaurora.org" <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ath10k: sdio: remove reduntant check in for loop
[snip]
> 'i' is only referenced once inside the loop to check boundary,
>
> the loop is actually iterating over cur_section, so i would make it
> clear in the loop statement, e.g.:
> Remove the break condition and the cur_section assignment at the end of
> the loop and use the loop statement to do it for you
>
> for (; cur_section; cur_section = next_section)
>
>
>> section_size = cur_section->end - cur_section->start;
>>
>> if (section_size <= 0) {
>> @@ -2318,7 +2318,7 @@ static int
>> ath10k_sdio_dump_memory_section(struct ath10k *ar,
>> break;
>> }
>>
>> - if ((i + 1) == mem_region->section_table.size) {
> And for i you can just increment it inline:
> if (++i == ...)
Good suggestions! I've sent a v2 with these changes.
>
>
>> + if (i == mem_region->section_table.size) {
>> /* last section */
>> next_section = NULL;
>> skip_size = 0;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists