netdev - Re: [PATCH v8 bpf-next 6/7] bpf: allow for tailcalls in BPF subprograms for x64 JIT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 17 Sep 2020 14:03:32 -0700
From:   Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>
To:     Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com>
Cc:     Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@...el.com>,
        Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 bpf-next 6/7] bpf: allow for tailcalls in BPF
 subprograms for x64 JIT

On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 3:54 PM Maciej Fijalkowski
<maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com> wrote:
>
> Relax verifier's restriction that was meant to forbid tailcall usage
> when subprog count was higher than 1.
>
> Also, do not max out the stack depth of program that utilizes tailcalls.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com>
> ---

Maciej,

Only patches 6 and 7 arrived (a while ago) and seems like the other
patches are lost and not going to come. Do you mind resending entire
patch set?

[...]