lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 17 Sep 2020 15:52:58 -0700
From:   Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
To:     Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com>
Cc:     Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@...el.com>,
        Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 bpf-next 6/7] bpf: allow for tailcalls in BPF
 subprograms for x64 JIT

On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 3:51 PM Maciej Fijalkowski
<maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 02:03:32PM -0700, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 3:54 PM Maciej Fijalkowski
> > <maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Relax verifier's restriction that was meant to forbid tailcall usage
> > > when subprog count was higher than 1.
> > >
> > > Also, do not max out the stack depth of program that utilizes tailcalls.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com>
> > > ---
> >
> > Maciej,
> >
> > Only patches 6 and 7 arrived (a while ago) and seems like the other
> > patches are lost and not going to come. Do you mind resending entire
> > patch set?
>
> Sure. Vger lately has been giving me a hard time, thought that maybe rest
> of set would eventually arrive, similarly to what Toke experienced I
> guess.

I've got the patches. No need to resend.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists