netdev - [PATCH net-next] net: ethernet: Remove set but not used variable

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 18 Sep 2020 16:39:38 +0800
From:   Zheng Yongjun <zhengyongjun3@...wei.com>
To:     <fmanlunas@...vell.com>, <sburla@...vell.com>,
        <dchickles@...vell.com>, <davem@...emloft.net>, <kuba@...nel.org>,
        <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     Zheng Yongjun <zhengyongjun3@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next] net: ethernet: Remove set but not used variable

Fixes gcc '-Wunused-but-set-variable' warning:

drivers/net/ethernet/cavium/liquidio/octeon_device.c: In function lio_pci_readq:
drivers/net/ethernet/cavium/liquidio/octeon_device.c:1327:6: warning: variable ‘val32’ set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]

drivers/net/ethernet/cavium/liquidio/octeon_device.c: In function lio_pci_writeq:
drivers/net/ethernet/cavium/liquidio/octeon_device.c:1358:6: warning: variable ‘val32’ set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]

these variable is never used, so remove it.

Signed-off-by: Zheng Yongjun <zhengyongjun3@...wei.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/cavium/liquidio/octeon_device.c | 9 ++++-----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/cavium/liquidio/octeon_device.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/cavium/liquidio/octeon_device.c
index ac32facaa427..fbde7c58c4db 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/cavium/liquidio/octeon_device.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/cavium/liquidio/octeon_device.c
@@ -1324,7 +1324,7 @@ u64 lio_pci_readq(struct octeon_device *oct, u64 addr)
 {
 	u64 val64;
 	unsigned long flags;
-	u32 val32, addrhi;
+	u32 addrhi;
 
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&oct->pci_win_lock, flags);
 
@@ -1339,10 +1339,10 @@ u64 lio_pci_readq(struct octeon_device *oct, u64 addr)
 	writel(addrhi, oct->reg_list.pci_win_rd_addr_hi);
 
 	/* Read back to preserve ordering of writes */
-	val32 = readl(oct->reg_list.pci_win_rd_addr_hi);
+	readl(oct->reg_list.pci_win_rd_addr_hi);
 
 	writel(addr & 0xffffffff, oct->reg_list.pci_win_rd_addr_lo);
-	val32 = readl(oct->reg_list.pci_win_rd_addr_lo);
+	readl(oct->reg_list.pci_win_rd_addr_lo);
 
 	val64 = readq(oct->reg_list.pci_win_rd_data);
 
@@ -1355,7 +1355,6 @@ void lio_pci_writeq(struct octeon_device *oct,
 		    u64 val,
 		    u64 addr)
 {
-	u32 val32;
 	unsigned long flags;
 
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&oct->pci_win_lock, flags);
@@ -1365,7 +1364,7 @@ void lio_pci_writeq(struct octeon_device *oct,
 	/* The write happens when the LSB is written. So write MSB first. */
 	writel(val >> 32, oct->reg_list.pci_win_wr_data_hi);
 	/* Read the MSB to ensure ordering of writes. */
-	val32 = readl(oct->reg_list.pci_win_wr_data_hi);
+	readl(oct->reg_list.pci_win_wr_data_hi);
 
 	writel(val & 0xffffffff, oct->reg_list.pci_win_wr_data_lo);
 
-- 
2.17.1