netdev - RE: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v3,net-next,0/4] Add Support for Marvell OcteonTX2 Cryptographic

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <BYAPR18MB2791FA01F325DCD41991A229A03F0@BYAPR18MB2791.namprd18.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Fri, 18 Sep 2020 12:30:30 +0000
From:   Srujana Challa <schalla@...vell.com>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
CC:     "herbert@...dor.apana.org.au" <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
        "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org" <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
        Sunil Kovvuri Goutham <sgoutham@...vell.com>,
        Geethasowjanya Akula <gakula@...vell.com>,
        Subbaraya Sundeep Bhatta <sbhatta@...vell.com>,
        Suheil Chandran <schandran@...vell.com>,
        "Narayana Prasad Raju Athreya" <pathreya@...vell.com>
Subject: RE: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v3,net-next,0/4] Add Support for Marvell
 OcteonTX2 Cryptographic

> Subject: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v3,net-next,0/4] Add Support for Marvell OcteonTX2
> Cryptographic
> 
> External Email
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> On Thu, 17 Sep 2020 18:58:31 +0530 Srujana Challa wrote:
> > The following series adds support for Marvell Cryptographic Acceleration
> > Unit(CPT) on OcteonTX2 CN96XX SoC.
> > This series is tested with CRYPTO_EXTRA_TESTS enabled and
> > CRYPTO_DISABLE_TESTS disabled.
> 
> No writeable debugfs files, please

I would like to get more clarity on few things, would you like debugfs entries to be read only  
and could you let me know the reason for not having writable entries?
> 
> Please provide more information about how users are going to make use
> of the functionality and what the capabilities are. You add 10K LoC
> and patches barely have barely a commit message.