[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200918185146.5322qugrmapyv7oo@skbuf>
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2020 21:59:50 +0300
From: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
To: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, yangbo.lu@....com,
xiaoliang.yang_1@....com, UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com,
claudiu.manoil@....com, andrew@...n.ch, vivien.didelot@...il.com,
f.fainelli@...il.com, kuba@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 05/11] net: dsa: seville: remove unused defines
for the mdio controller
On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 07:37:19PM +0200, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> On 18/09/2020 18:54:42+0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 05:46:45PM +0200, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> > > On 18/09/2020 13:57:47+0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> > > > From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
> > > >
> > > > Some definitions were likely copied from
> > > > drivers/net/mdio/mdio-mscc-miim.c.
> > > >
> > > > They are not necessary, remove them.
> > >
> > > Seeing that the mdio controller is probably the same, couldn't
> > > mdio-mscc-miim be reused?
> >
> > Yeah, it probably can, but for 75 lines of code, is it worth it to
> > butcher mdio-mscc-miim too? I'm not sure at what level that reuse should
> > be. Should we pass it our regmap? mdio-mscc-miim doesn't use regmap.
>
> It may be worth it, I'm going to add DSA support for ocelot over SPI. So
> to abstract the bus, it is probably worth moving to regmap.
Wow, that's interesting, tell me more. For traffic, will you be using
an NPI port, or some other configuration?
And as for reusing mdio-mscc-miim, I think I'll look into that as a
separate set of patches.
Thanks,
-Vladimir
Powered by blists - more mailing lists