netdev - Re: [PATCH v3 net-next 7/9] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Add devlink regions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <f4942b08-3bf8-cdd6-a8b7-61b77c746648@gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 17 Sep 2020 19:32:18 -0700
From:   Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Chris Healy <cphealy@...il.com>,
        Jiri Pirko <jiri@...dia.com>,
        Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 net-next 7/9] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Add devlink regions



On 9/9/2020 4:58 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> Allow the global registers, and the ATU to be snapshot via devlink
> regions. It is later planned to add support for the port registers.
> 
> v2:
> Remove left over debug prints
> Comment ATU format is generic for mv88e6xxx, not wider
> 
> v3:
> Make use of ops structure passed to snapshot function
> Remove port regions
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
> ---

[snip]

> +static int mv88e6xxx_region_global_snapshot(struct devlink *dl,
> +					    const struct devlink_region_ops *ops,
> +					    struct netlink_ext_ack *extack,
> +					    u8 **data)
> +{
> +	struct dsa_switch *ds = dsa_devlink_to_ds(dl);
> +	struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip = ds->priv;
> +	u16 *registers;
> +	int i, err;
> +
> +	registers = kmalloc_array(32, sizeof(u16), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!registers)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	mv88e6xxx_reg_lock(chip);
> +	for (i = 0; i < 32; i++) {
> +		switch ((long)ops->priv) {
> +		case 1:
> +			err = mv88e6xxx_g1_read(chip, i, &registers[i]);
> +			break;
> +		case 2:
> +			err = mv88e6xxx_g1_read(chip, i, &registers[i]);

Should this be mv88e6xxx_g2_read() here? Can you use the region IDs you 
defined above?

> +			break;
> +		default:
> +			err = -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +		}
> +
> +		if (err) {
> +			kfree(registers);
> +			goto out;
> +		}
> +	}
> +	*data = (u8 *)registers;
> +out:
> +	mv88e6xxx_reg_unlock(chip);
> +
> +	return err;
> +}
> +
> +/* The ATU entry varies between mv88e6xxx chipset generations. Define
> + * a generic format which covers all the current and hopefully future
> + * mv88e6xxx generations
> + */
> +
> +struct mv88e6xxx_devlink_atu_entry {
> +	/* The FID is scattered over multiple registers. */
> +	u16 fid;
> +	u16 atu_op;
> +	u16 atu_data;
> +	u16 atu_01;
> +	u16 atu_23;
> +	u16 atu_45;
> +};
> +
> +static int mv88e6xxx_region_atu_snapshot_fid(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip,
> +					     int fid,
> +					     struct mv88e6xxx_devlink_atu_entry *table,
> +					     int *count)
> +{
> +	u16 atu_op, atu_data, atu_01, atu_23, atu_45;
> +	struct mv88e6xxx_atu_entry addr;
> +	int err;
> +
> +	addr.state = 0;
> +	eth_broadcast_addr(addr.mac);
> +
> +	do {
> +		err = mv88e6xxx_g1_atu_getnext(chip, fid, &addr);
> +		if (err)
> +			return err;
> +
> +		if (!addr.state)
> +			break;
> +
> +		err = mv88e6xxx_g1_read(chip, MV88E6XXX_G1_ATU_OP, &atu_op);
> +		if (err)
> +			return err;
> +
> +		err = mv88e6xxx_g1_read(chip, MV88E6XXX_G1_ATU_DATA, &atu_data);
> +		if (err)
> +			return err;
> +
> +		err = mv88e6xxx_g1_read(chip, MV88E6XXX_G1_ATU_MAC01, &atu_01);
> +		if (err)
> +			return err;
> +
> +		err = mv88e6xxx_g1_read(chip, MV88E6XXX_G1_ATU_MAC23, &atu_23);
> +		if (err)
> +			return err;
> +
> +		err = mv88e6xxx_g1_read(chip, MV88E6XXX_G1_ATU_MAC45, &atu_45);
> +		if (err)
> +			return err;
> +
> +		table[*count].fid = fid;
> +		table[*count].atu_op = atu_op;
> +		table[*count].atu_data = atu_data;
> +		table[*count].atu_01 = atu_01;
> +		table[*count].atu_23 = atu_23;
> +		table[*count].atu_45 = atu_45;

Can you refactor this to use a for/while loop?


> +		(*count)++;
> +	} while (!is_broadcast_ether_addr(addr.mac));
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int mv88e6xxx_region_atu_snapshot(struct devlink *dl,
> +					 const struct devlink_region_ops *ops,
> +					 struct netlink_ext_ack *extack,
> +					 u8 **data)
> +{
> +	struct dsa_switch *ds = dsa_devlink_to_ds(dl);
> +	DECLARE_BITMAP(fid_bitmap, MV88E6XXX_N_FID);
> +	struct mv88e6xxx_devlink_atu_entry *table;
> +	struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip = ds->priv;
> +	int fid = -1, count, err;
> +
> +	table = kmalloc_array(mv88e6xxx_num_databases(chip),
> +			      sizeof(struct mv88e6xxx_devlink_atu_entry),
> +			      GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!table)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	memset(table, 0, mv88e6xxx_num_databases(chip) *
> +	       sizeof(struct mv88e6xxx_devlink_atu_entry));
> +
> +	count = 0;
> +
> +	mv88e6xxx_reg_lock(chip);
> +
> +	err = mv88e6xxx_fid_map(chip, fid_bitmap);
> +	if (err)
> +		goto out;
> +
> +	while (1) {
> +		fid = find_next_bit(fid_bitmap, MV88E6XXX_N_FID, fid + 1);
> +		if (fid == MV88E6XXX_N_FID)
> +			break;
> +
> +		err =  mv88e6xxx_region_atu_snapshot_fid(chip, fid, table,
> +							 &count);
> +		if (err) {
> +			kfree(table);
> +			goto out;
> +		}
> +	}
> +	*data = (u8 *)table;
> +out:
> +	mv88e6xxx_reg_unlock(chip);
> +
> +	return err;
> +}
> +
> +static struct devlink_region_ops mv88e6xxx_region_global1_ops = {
> +	.name = "global1",
> +	.snapshot = mv88e6xxx_region_global_snapshot,
> +	.destructor = kfree,
> +	.priv = (void *)1,

Can you use the region IDs you defined?
-- 
Florian