[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <SN6PR11MB28969A31367ECAB8B0452FACBC3C0@SN6PR11MB2896.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2020 07:04:34 +0000
From: "Brown, Aaron F" <aaron.f.brown@...el.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org" <intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>
Subject: RE: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next v1 5/7] i40e: convert to new
udp_tunnel infrastructure
> From: Intel-wired-lan <intel-wired-lan-bounces@...osl.org> On Behalf Of Jakub
> Kicinski
> Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2020 6:27 PM
> To: davem@...emloft.net
> Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org; intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org; Jakub Kicinski
> <kuba@...nel.org>
> Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next v1 5/7] i40e: convert to new
> udp_tunnel infrastructure
>
> Make use of the "shared port table" to convert i40e to the new
> infra.
>
> i40e did not have any reference tracking, locking is also dodgy
> because rtnl gets released while talking to FW, so port may get
> removed from the table while it's getting added etc.
>
> On the good side i40e does not seem to be using the ports for
> TX so we can remove the table from the driver state completely.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e.h | 6 +-
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c | 264 ++++----------------
> 2 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 219 deletions(-)
>
Tested-by: Aaron Brown <aaron.f.brown@...el.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists