netdev - RE: [PATCH 1/9] kernel: add a PF_FORCE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6d064d8688324279af89152a8da22d69@AcuMS.aculab.com>
Date:   Sat, 19 Sep 2020 14:53:08 +0000
From:   David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
To:     'Al Viro' <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
CC:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-mips@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mips@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
        "linux-s390@...r.kernel.org" <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>,
        "sparclinux@...r.kernel.org" <sparclinux@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-block@...r.kernel.org" <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-aio@...ck.org" <linux-aio@...ck.org>,
        "io-uring@...r.kernel.org" <io-uring@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-arch@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "keyrings@...r.kernel.org" <keyrings@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org" 
        <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/9] kernel: add a PF_FORCE_COMPAT flag

From: Al Viro
> Sent: 18 September 2020 14:58
> 
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 03:44:06PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 02:40:12PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> > > >  	/* Vector 0x110 is LINUX_32BIT_SYSCALL_TRAP */
> > > > -	return pt_regs_trap_type(current_pt_regs()) == 0x110;
> > > > +	return pt_regs_trap_type(current_pt_regs()) == 0x110 ||
> > > > +		(current->flags & PF_FORCE_COMPAT);
> > >
> > > Can't say I like that approach ;-/  Reasoning about the behaviour is much
> > > harder when it's controlled like that - witness set_fs() shite...
> >
> > I don't particularly like it either.  But do you have a better idea
> > how to deal with io_uring vs compat tasks?
> 
> <wry> git rm fs/io_uring.c would make a good starting point </wry>
> Yes, I know it's not going to happen, but one can dream...

Maybe the io_uring code needs some changes to make it vaguely safe.
- No support for 32-bit compat mixed working (or at all?).
  Plausibly a special worker could do 32bit work.
- ring structure (I'm assuming mapped by mmap()) never mapped
  in more than one process (not cloned by fork()).
- No implicit handover of files to another process.
  Would need an munmap, handover, mmap sequence.

In any case the io_ring rather abuses the import_iovec() interface.

The canonical sequence is (types from memory):
	struct iovec cache[8], *iov = cache;
	struct iter iter;
	...
	rval = import_iovec(..., &iov, 8, &iter);
	// Do read/write user using 'iter'
	free(iov);

I don't think there is any strict requirement that iter.iov
is set to either 'cache' or 'iov' (it probably must point
into one of them.)
But the io_uring code will make that assumption because the
actual copies can be done much later and it doesn't save 'iter'.
It gets itself in a right mess because it doesn't separate
the 'address I need to free' from 'the iov[] for any transfers'.

io_uring is also the only code that relies on import_iovec()
returning the iter.count on success.
It would be much better to have:
	iov = import_iovec(..., &cache, ...);
	free(iov);
and use ERR_PTR() et al for error detectoion.

	David

-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)