netdev - [PATCH RFC/RFT 0/2] W=1 by default for Ethernet PHY subsystem

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200919190258.3673246-1-andrew@lunn.ch>
Date:   Sat, 19 Sep 2020 21:02:56 +0200
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To:     netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
        Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>,
        linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Subject: [PATCH RFC/RFT 0/2] W=1 by default for Ethernet PHY subsystem

There is a movement to make the code base compile clean with W=1. Some
subsystems are already clean. In order to keep them clean, we need
developers to build new code with W=1 by default in these subsystems.

This patchset refactors the core Makefile warning code to allow the
additional warnings W=1 adds available to any Makefile. The Ethernet
PHY subsystem Makefiles then make use of this to make W=1 the default
for this subsystem.

RFT since i've only tested with x86 and arm with a modern gcc. Is the
code really clean for older compilers? For clang?

Andrew Lunn (2):
  scripts: Makefile.extrawarn: Add W=1 warnings to a symbol
  net: phylib: Enable W=1 by default

 drivers/net/mdio/Makefile  |  3 +++
 drivers/net/pcs/Makefile   |  3 +++
 drivers/net/phy/Makefile   |  3 +++
 scripts/Makefile.extrawarn | 33 ++++++++++++++++++---------------
 4 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

-- 
2.28.0