lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2020 23:33:41 +0000 From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com> To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch> CC: netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...dia.com>, Chris Healy <cphealy@...il.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next RFC v1 0/4] Add per port devlink regions On Sat, Sep 19, 2020 at 04:43:28PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote: > > DSA only instantiates devlink ports for switch ports which are used. > For this hardware, only 4 user ports and the CPU port have devlink > ports, which explains the discontinuous port regions. This is not so much a choice, as it is a workaround of the fact that dsa_port_setup(), which registers devlink ports with devlink, is called after ds->ops->setup(), so you can't register your port regions from the same place as the global regions now. So you're doing it from ds->ops->port_enable(), which is the DSA wrapper for .ndo_open(). So, consequently, your port regions will only be registered when the port is up, and will be unregistered when it goes down. Is that what you want? I understand that users probably think they want to debug only the ports that they actively use, but I've heard of at least one problem in the past which was caused by invalid settings (flooding in that case) on a port that was down. Sure, this is probably a rare situation, but as I said, somebody trying to use port regions to debug something like that is probably going to have a hard time, because it isn't an easy surgery to figure the probe ordering out. Thanks, -Vladimir
Powered by blists - more mailing lists