[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <dbe191ee-aef5-2e32-c4a6-d18b3d73ebe3@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2020 19:33:22 -0700
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
davem@...emloft.net
Cc: andrew@...n.ch, vivien.didelot@...il.com, idosch@...sch.org,
jiri@...nulli.us, kurt.kanzenbach@...utronix.de, kuba@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/9] net: dsa: deny enslaving 802.1Q upper to
VLAN-aware bridge from PRECHANGEUPPER
On 9/19/2020 6:47 PM, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> There doesn't seem to be any strong technical reason for doing it this
> way, but we'll be adding more checks for invalid upper device
> configurations, and it will be easier to have them all grouped under
> PRECHANGEUPPER.
>
> Tested that it still works:
> ip link set br0 type bridge vlan_filtering 1
> ip link add link swp2 name swp2.100 type vlan id 100
> ip link set swp2.100 master br0
> [ 20.321312] br0: port 5(swp2.100) entered blocking state
> [ 20.326711] br0: port 5(swp2.100) entered disabled state
> Error: dsa_core: Cannot enslave VLAN device into VLAN aware bridge.
> [ 20.346549] br0: port 5(swp2.100) entered blocking state
> [ 20.351957] br0: port 5(swp2.100) entered disabled state
>
> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
--
Florian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists