[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1453768496.36855.1600713879236.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2020 14:44:39 -0400 (EDT)
From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
To: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/3] l3mdev icmp error route lookup fixes
----- On Sep 21, 2020, at 2:36 PM, David Ahern dsahern@...il.com wrote:
> On 9/18/20 12:17 PM, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Here is an updated series of fixes for ipv4 and ipv6 which which ensure
>> the route lookup is performed on the right routing table in VRF
>> configurations when sending TTL expired icmp errors (useful for
>> traceroute).
>>
>> It includes tests for both ipv4 and ipv6.
>>
>> These fixes address specifically address the code paths involved in
>> sending TTL expired icmp errors. As detailed in the individual commit
>> messages, those fixes do not address similar issues related to network
>> namespaces and unreachable / fragmentation needed messages, which appear
>> to use different code paths.
>>
>
> New selftests are failing:
> TEST: Ping received ICMP frag needed [FAIL]
>
> Both IPv4 and IPv6 versions are failing.
Indeed, this situation is discussed in each patch commit message:
ipv4:
[ It has also been pointed out that a similar issue exists with
unreachable / fragmentation needed messages, which can be triggered by
changing the MTU of eth1 in r1 to 1400 and running:
ip netns exec h1 ping -s 1450 -Mdo -c1 172.16.2.2
Some investigation points to raw_icmp_error() and raw_err() as being
involved in this last scenario. The focus of this patch is TTL expired
ICMP messages, which go through icmp_route_lookup.
Investigation of failure modes related to raw_icmp_error() is beyond
this investigation's scope. ]
ipv6:
[ Testing shows that similar issues exist with ipv6 unreachable /
fragmentation needed messages. However, investigation of this
additional failure mode is beyond this investigation's scope. ]
I do not have the time to investigate further unfortunately, so I
thought it best to post what I have.
Note that network namespaces also probably have the same problem,
but those are not covered by the test cases.
Thanks,
Mathieu
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists