lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 22 Sep 2020 23:08:10 +0200
From:   Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
To:     Nitesh Narayan Lal <nitesh@...hat.com>
Cc:     Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>, bhelgaas@...gle.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, sassmann@...hat.com,
        jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com, jacob.e.keller@...el.com,
        jlelli@...hat.com, hch@...radead.org, mike.marciniszyn@...el.com,
        dennis.dalessandro@...el.com, thomas.lendacky@....com,
        jerinj@...vell.com, mathias.nyman@...el.com, jiri@...dia.com
Subject: Re: [RFC][Patch v1 3/3] PCI: Limit pci_alloc_irq_vectors as per
 housekeeping CPUs

On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 09:54:58AM -0400, Nitesh Narayan Lal wrote:
> >> If min_vecs > num_housekeeping, for example:
> >>
> >> /* PCI MSI/MSIx support */
> >> #define XGBE_MSI_BASE_COUNT     4
> >> #define XGBE_MSI_MIN_COUNT      (XGBE_MSI_BASE_COUNT + 1)
> >>
> >> Then the protection fails.
> > Right, I was ignoring that case.
> >
> >> How about reducing max_vecs down to min_vecs, if min_vecs >
> >> num_housekeeping ?
> > Yes, I think this makes sense.
> > I will wait a bit to see if anyone else has any other comment and will post
> > the next version then.
> >
> 
> Are there any other comments/concerns on this patch that I need to address in
> the next posting?

No objection from me, I don't know much about this area anyway.

> -- 
> Nitesh
> 



Powered by blists - more mailing lists