| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAOY-YVnFtDMkRVVg4TZ-3rRxciRYwEQCf-ctbm9=KbF4=1FqMA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2020 19:44:00 +0530
From: Himadri Pandya <himadrispandya@...il.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.com>,
pankaj.laxminarayan.bharadiya@...el.com,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, yuehaibing@...wei.com,
petkan@...leusys.com, ogiannou@...il.com,
USB list <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] net: rndis_host: use usb_control_msg_recv() and usb_control_msg_send()
On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 3:52 PM Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 02:35:19PM +0530, Himadri Pandya wrote:
> > The new usb_control_msg_recv() and usb_control_msg_send() nicely wraps
> > usb_control_msg() with proper error check. Hence use the wrappers
> > instead of calling usb_control_msg() directly.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Himadri Pandya <himadrispandya@...il.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/usb/rndis_host.c | 44 ++++++++++++++----------------------
> > 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/usb/rndis_host.c b/drivers/net/usb/rndis_host.c
> > index 6fa7a009a24a..30fc4a7183d3 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/usb/rndis_host.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/usb/rndis_host.c
> > @@ -113,14 +113,13 @@ int rndis_command(struct usbnet *dev, struct rndis_msg_hdr *buf, int buflen)
> > buf->request_id = (__force __le32) xid;
> > }
> > master_ifnum = info->control->cur_altsetting->desc.bInterfaceNumber;
> > - retval = usb_control_msg(dev->udev,
> > - usb_sndctrlpipe(dev->udev, 0),
> > - USB_CDC_SEND_ENCAPSULATED_COMMAND,
> > - USB_TYPE_CLASS | USB_RECIP_INTERFACE,
> > - 0, master_ifnum,
> > - buf, le32_to_cpu(buf->msg_len),
> > - RNDIS_CONTROL_TIMEOUT_MS);
> > - if (unlikely(retval < 0 || xid == 0))
> > + retval = usb_control_msg_send(dev->udev, 0,
> > + USB_CDC_SEND_ENCAPSULATED_COMMAND,
> > + USB_TYPE_CLASS | USB_RECIP_INTERFACE,
> > + 0, master_ifnum, buf,
> > + le32_to_cpu(buf->msg_len),
> > + RNDIS_CONTROL_TIMEOUT_MS);
> > + if (unlikely(xid == 0))
> > return retval;
> >
> > /* Some devices don't respond on the control channel until
> > @@ -139,14 +138,11 @@ int rndis_command(struct usbnet *dev, struct rndis_msg_hdr *buf, int buflen)
> > /* Poll the control channel; the request probably completed immediately */
> > rsp = le32_to_cpu(buf->msg_type) | RNDIS_MSG_COMPLETION;
> > for (count = 0; count < 10; count++) {
> > - memset(buf, 0, CONTROL_BUFFER_SIZE);
> > - retval = usb_control_msg(dev->udev,
> > - usb_rcvctrlpipe(dev->udev, 0),
> > - USB_CDC_GET_ENCAPSULATED_RESPONSE,
> > - USB_DIR_IN | USB_TYPE_CLASS | USB_RECIP_INTERFACE,
> > - 0, master_ifnum,
> > - buf, buflen,
> > - RNDIS_CONTROL_TIMEOUT_MS);
> > + retval = usb_control_msg_recv(dev->udev, 0,
> > + USB_CDC_GET_ENCAPSULATED_RESPONSE,
> > + USB_DIR_IN | USB_TYPE_CLASS | USB_RECIP_INTERFACE,
> > + 0, master_ifnum, buf, buflen,
> > + RNDIS_CONTROL_TIMEOUT_MS);
> > if (likely(retval >= 8)) {
>
> retval here is never going to be positive, right? So I don't think this
> patch is correct :(
>
Yes :(.
> > msg_type = le32_to_cpu(buf->msg_type);
> > msg_len = le32_to_cpu(buf->msg_len);
> > @@ -178,17 +174,11 @@ int rndis_command(struct usbnet *dev, struct rndis_msg_hdr *buf, int buflen)
> > msg->msg_type = cpu_to_le32(RNDIS_MSG_KEEPALIVE_C);
> > msg->msg_len = cpu_to_le32(sizeof *msg);
> > msg->status = cpu_to_le32(RNDIS_STATUS_SUCCESS);
> > - retval = usb_control_msg(dev->udev,
> > - usb_sndctrlpipe(dev->udev, 0),
> > - USB_CDC_SEND_ENCAPSULATED_COMMAND,
> > - USB_TYPE_CLASS | USB_RECIP_INTERFACE,
> > - 0, master_ifnum,
> > - msg, sizeof *msg,
> > - RNDIS_CONTROL_TIMEOUT_MS);
> > - if (unlikely(retval < 0))
> > - dev_dbg(&info->control->dev,
> > - "rndis keepalive err %d\n",
> > - retval);
> > + retval = usb_control_msg_send(dev->udev, 0,
> > + USB_CDC_SEND_ENCAPSULATED_COMMAND,
> > + USB_TYPE_CLASS | USB_RECIP_INTERFACE,
> > + 0, master_ifnum, msg, sizeof(*msg),
> > + RNDIS_CONTROL_TIMEOUT_MS);
>
> You lost the error message that the previous call had if something went
> wrong. Don't know if it's really needed, but there's no reason to
> remove it here.
>
The wrapper returns the error so thought that might work instead. But
yes, the old msg is better.
Anyways, this series is dropped :).
Thanks for the review,
Himadri
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists