netdev - Re: [PATCH 5/9] fs: remove various compat readv/writev helpers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200923145901.GN3421308@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date:   Wed, 23 Sep 2020 15:59:01 +0100
From:   Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
        David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org,
        linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
        sparclinux@...r.kernel.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-aio@...ck.org, io-uring@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, keyrings@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/9] fs: remove various compat readv/writev helpers

On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 04:32:51PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 03:25:49PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 08:05:43AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > >  COMPAT_SYSCALL_DEFINE3(readv, compat_ulong_t, fd,
> > > -		const struct compat_iovec __user *,vec,
> > > +		const struct iovec __user *, vec,
> > 
> > Um...  Will it even compile?
> > 
> > >  #ifdef __ARCH_WANT_COMPAT_SYS_PREADV64
> > >  COMPAT_SYSCALL_DEFINE4(preadv64, unsigned long, fd,
> > > -		const struct compat_iovec __user *,vec,
> > > +		const struct iovec __user *, vec,
> > 
> > Ditto.  Look into include/linux/compat.h and you'll see
> > 
> > asmlinkage long compat_sys_preadv64(unsigned long fd,
> >                 const struct compat_iovec __user *vec,
> >                 unsigned long vlen, loff_t pos);
> > 
> > How does that manage to avoid the compiler screaming bloody
> > murder?
> 
> That's a very good question.  But it does not just compile but actually
> works.  Probably because all the syscall wrappers mean that we don't
> actually generate the normal names.  I just tried this:
> 
> --- a/include/linux/syscalls.h
> +++ b/include/linux/syscalls.h
> @@ -468,7 +468,7 @@ asmlinkage long sys_lseek(unsigned int fd, off_t offset,
>  asmlinkage long sys_read(unsigned int fd, char __user *buf, size_t count);
>  asmlinkage long sys_write(unsigned int fd, const char __user *buf,
>                             size_t count);
> -asmlinkage long sys_readv(unsigned long fd,
> +asmlinkage long sys_readv(void *fd,
> 
> for fun, and the compiler doesn't care either..

Try to build it for sparc or ppc...