lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 23 Sep 2020 17:10:33 +0200
From:   Rolf Reintjes <>
To:     Mark Brown <>,,
        Julia Lawall <>
        Yossi Leybovich <>,,,,,,,,
        Dan Williams <>,
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/14] drop double zeroing

Hello Mark,

On 21.09.20 18:58, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Sep 2020 13:26:12 +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
>> sg_init_table zeroes its first argument, so the allocation of that argument
>> doesn't have to.
> Applied to
> for-next
> Thanks!

I do not understand which of the 14 patches you applied. Your mail 
responds to the 00/14 mail.


> [1/1] spi/topcliff-pch: drop double zeroing
>        commit: ca03dba30f2b8ff45a2972c6691e4c96d8c52b3b
> All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
> tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
> the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
> problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.
> You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
> and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
> send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.
> If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
> should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
> patches will not be replaced.
> Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
> to this mail.
> Thanks,
> Mark

Powered by blists - more mailing lists