lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 23 Sep 2020 14:39:13 -0700
From:   Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To:     Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
Cc:     "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "olteanv@...il.com" <olteanv@...il.com>,
        "nikolay@...dia.com" <nikolay@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 0/2] net: dsa: b53: Configure VLANs while not
 filtering

On 9/23/20 2:30 PM, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 11:51:48PM +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 01:49:54PM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>>> On 9/23/20 1:45 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>>>
>>> David, Jakub, there is an unnecessary header inclusion in
>>> net/dsa/tag_brcm.c in the second patch and the description at the end of
>>> the commit was not updated, let me send a v3 right away.
>>> --
>>> Florian
>>
>> Wait a few minutes, I don't think anybody has had a chance to look at it..
> 
> So I studied a little bit the situation with the MAC header pointer in
> the second patch, especially since there are 2 call paths, but it's ok,
> since at that point the skb->data points to its final position already,
> then the MAC header is naturally 14 bytes behind.
> I've been testing with the ocelot driver which resets the MAC header
> manually, that explains why I missed that. Anyway, if there are no other
> comments I think you can resend.

Yes, I was looking at tag_ocelot.c as well for a reference. At some
point I was considering adding a version that let the tagging driver
specifying the struct vlan_ethhdr reference directly since the tagging
driver knows, but using skb_set_mac_header() works equally well in a
more portable way even.

Thanks, v3 on its way with your A-b tag.
-- 
Florian

Powered by blists - more mailing lists