netdev - Re: [pull request][net-next V3 00/12] mlx5 Multi packet tx descriptors for SKBs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200922.174530.742039366455945503.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:   Tue, 22 Sep 2020 17:45:30 -0700 (PDT)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     saeed@...nel.org
Cc:     kuba@...nel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, saeedm@...dia.com
Subject: Re: [pull request][net-next V3 00/12] mlx5 Multi packet tx
 descriptors for SKBs

From: saeed@...nel.org
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2020 19:46:52 -0700

> From: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>
> 
> Hi Dave & Jakub
> 
> This series adds support for Multi packet tx descriptors for SKBs.
> For more information please see tag log below.
> 
> v1->v2:
>  - Move small irrelevant changes from the refactoring patch to separate
> patches.
>  - Don't touch mlx5e_txwqe_build_eseg_csum without need.
> 
> v2->v3:
> Manual inlining was dropped, test results were updated for GCC 10. The
> previous numbers were measured on a kernel compiled with GCC 4.9, and it
> turns out that the new GCC optimizes code in a different way, and manual
> inlining is not needed to avoid performance degradation with GCC 10.
> 
> Please pull and let me know if there is any problem.

Pulled, thank you.