[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7f9e20b2eab783303c4e5f5c3244366fa88a6567.camel@suse.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2020 13:13:56 +0200
From: Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.com>
To: Himadri Pandya <himadrispandya@...il.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
pankaj.laxminarayan.bharadiya@...el.com,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, yuehaibing@...wei.com,
petkan@...leusys.com, ogiannou@...il.com,
USB list <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linuxfoundation.org,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] net: usb: rtl8150: use usb_control_msg_recv() and
usb_control_msg_send()
Am Mittwoch, den 23.09.2020, 20:02 +0530 schrieb Himadri Pandya:
> I meant that it was stupid to change it without properly understanding
> the significance of GFP_NOIO in this context.
>
> So now, do we re-write the wrapper functions with flag passed as a parameter?
Hi,
I hope I set you in CC for a patch set doing exactly that.
Do not let me or other maintainers discourage you from writing patches.
Look at it this way. Had you not written this patch, I would not have
looked into the matter. Patches are supposed to be reviewed.
If you want additional information, just ask. We do not want
people discouraged from writing substantial patches.
Regards
Oliver
Powered by blists - more mailing lists