| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <13ff51f8-10d8-df3a-048e-cfd8563dc2de@nvidia.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2020 22:29:55 +0300
From: Moshe Shemesh <moshe@...dia.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Moshe Shemesh <moshe@...lanox.com>
CC: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next RFC v5 02/15] devlink: Add reload action limit
level
On 9/23/2020 9:36 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Sep 2020 19:06:38 +0300 Moshe Shemesh wrote:
>> Add reload action limit level to demand restrictions on actions.
>> Reload action limit levels supported:
>> none (default): No constrains on actions. Driver implementation may
>> include reset or downtime as needed to perform the
>> actions.
>> no_reset: No reset allowed, no down time allowed, no link flap and no
>> configuration is lost.
>>
>> Some combinations of action and limit level are invalid. For example,
>> driver can not reinitialize its entities without any downtime.
>>
>> The no_reset limit level will have usecase in this patchset to
>> implement restricted fw_activate on mlx5.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Moshe Shemesh <moshe@...lanox.com>
>> ---
>> v4 -> v5:
>> - Remove check DEVLINK_RELOAD_ACTION_LIMIT_LEVEL_MAX
>> - Added list of invalid action-limit_level combinations and add check to
>> supported actions and levels and check user request
>> v3 -> v4:
>> - New patch
>> ---
>> drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/main.c | 3 +
>> .../net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/devlink.c | 3 +
>> drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/core.c | 3 +
>> drivers/net/netdevsim/dev.c | 6 +-
>> include/net/devlink.h | 6 +-
>> include/uapi/linux/devlink.h | 17 +++++
>> net/core/devlink.c | 76 +++++++++++++++++--
>> 7 files changed, 107 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/main.c
>> index 1a482120cc0a..f0ef295af477 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/main.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/main.c
>> @@ -3947,6 +3947,7 @@ static int mlx4_restart_one_up(struct pci_dev *pdev, bool reload,
>>
>> static int mlx4_devlink_reload_down(struct devlink *devlink, bool netns_change,
>> enum devlink_reload_action action,
>> + enum devlink_reload_action_limit_level limit_level,
>> struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
>> {
>> struct mlx4_priv *priv = devlink_priv(devlink);
>> @@ -3964,6 +3965,7 @@ static int mlx4_devlink_reload_down(struct devlink *devlink, bool netns_change,
>> }
>>
>> static int mlx4_devlink_reload_up(struct devlink *devlink, enum devlink_reload_action action,
>> + enum devlink_reload_action_limit_level limit_level,
>> struct netlink_ext_ack *extack, unsigned long *actions_performed)
>> {
>> struct mlx4_priv *priv = devlink_priv(devlink);
>> @@ -3985,6 +3987,7 @@ static int mlx4_devlink_reload_up(struct devlink *devlink, enum devlink_reload_a
>> static const struct devlink_ops mlx4_devlink_ops = {
>> .port_type_set = mlx4_devlink_port_type_set,
>> .supported_reload_actions = BIT(DEVLINK_RELOAD_ACTION_DRIVER_REINIT),
>> + .supported_reload_action_limit_levels = BIT(DEVLINK_RELOAD_ACTION_LIMIT_LEVEL_NONE),
> Please cut down the name lenghts, this is just lazy.
>
> 'supported_reload_limits' or 'cap_reload_limits' is perfectly
> sufficient.
>
> 'reload_limits' would be even better. Cause what else would it be if
> not a capability.
Sounds good.
So instead of supported_reload_actions_limit_levels will have reload_limits.
Instead of supported_reload_actions will have reload_actions, OK ?
May also use reload_limit_level instead of reload_action_limit_level
everywhere if its clear enough.
> Besides I don't think drivers should have to fill negative attributes
> (that they don't support something). Everyone is always going to
> support NONE, since it's "unspecified" / "pick your favorite", right?
Good point, will remove it.
>> .reload_down = mlx4_devlink_reload_down,
>> .reload_up = mlx4_devlink_reload_up,
>> };
>> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/devlink.h b/include/uapi/linux/devlink.h
>> index fdba7ab58a79..0c5d942dcbd5 100644
>> --- a/include/uapi/linux/devlink.h
>> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/devlink.h
>> @@ -289,6 +289,22 @@ enum devlink_reload_action {
>> DEVLINK_RELOAD_ACTION_MAX = __DEVLINK_RELOAD_ACTION_MAX - 1
>> };
>>
>> +/**
>> + * enum devlink_reload_action_limit_level - Reload action limit level.
>> + * @DEVLINK_RELOAD_ACTION_LIMIT_LEVEL_NONE: No constrains on action. Action may include
>> + * reset or downtime as needed.
>> + * @DEVLINK_RELOAD_ACTION_LIMIT_LEVEL_NO_RESET: No reset allowed, no down time allowed,
>> + * no link flap and no configuration is lost.
>> + */
>> +enum devlink_reload_action_limit_level {
> You reserved UNSPEC for actions but not for limit level?
Yes, I used LIMIT_LEVEL_NONE = 0 as no limit needed, so I skipped UNSPEC.
Maybe should add UNSPEC and use UNSPEC as no limit needed. But UNSPEC is
kind of invalid.
>> + DEVLINK_RELOAD_ACTION_LIMIT_LEVEL_NONE,
>> + DEVLINK_RELOAD_ACTION_LIMIT_LEVEL_NO_RESET,
>> +
>> + /* Add new reload actions limit level above */
>> + __DEVLINK_RELOAD_ACTION_LIMIT_LEVEL_MAX,
>> + DEVLINK_RELOAD_ACTION_LIMIT_LEVEL_MAX = __DEVLINK_RELOAD_ACTION_LIMIT_LEVEL_MAX - 1
>> +};
>> +
>> enum devlink_attr {
>> /* don't change the order or add anything between, this is ABI! */
>> DEVLINK_ATTR_UNSPEC,
>> @@ -480,6 +496,7 @@ enum devlink_attr {
>>
>> DEVLINK_ATTR_RELOAD_ACTION, /* u8 */
>> DEVLINK_ATTR_RELOAD_ACTIONS_PERFORMED, /* nested */
>> + DEVLINK_ATTR_RELOAD_ACTION_LIMIT_LEVEL, /* u8 */
>>
>> /* add new attributes above here, update the policy in devlink.c */
>>
>> diff --git a/net/core/devlink.c b/net/core/devlink.c
>> index 318ef29f81f2..fee6fcc7dead 100644
>> --- a/net/core/devlink.c
>> +++ b/net/core/devlink.c
>> @@ -462,12 +462,45 @@ static int devlink_nl_put_handle(struct sk_buff *msg, struct devlink *devlink)
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> +struct devlink_reload_combination {
>> + enum devlink_reload_action action;
>> + enum devlink_reload_action_limit_level limit_level;
>> +};
>> +
>> +static const struct devlink_reload_combination devlink_reload_invalid_combinations[] = {
>> + {
>> + /* can't reinitialize driver with no down time */
>> + .action = DEVLINK_RELOAD_ACTION_DRIVER_REINIT,
>> + .limit_level = DEVLINK_RELOAD_ACTION_LIMIT_LEVEL_NO_RESET,
>> + },
>> +};
>> +
>> +static bool
>> +devlink_reload_combination_is_invalid(enum devlink_reload_action action,
>> + enum devlink_reload_action_limit_level limit_level)
>> +{
>> + int i;
>> +
>> + for (i = 0 ; i < ARRAY_SIZE(devlink_reload_invalid_combinations) ; i++)
> Whitespace. Did you checkpatch?
Yes, checked it again now, it still pass. I think checkpatch doesn't see
double space.
But anyway, I missed it, I will fix.
>> + if (devlink_reload_invalid_combinations[i].action == action &&
>> + devlink_reload_invalid_combinations[i].limit_level == limit_level)
>> + return true;
>> + return false;
>> +}
>> +
>> static bool
>> devlink_reload_action_is_supported(struct devlink *devlink, enum devlink_reload_action action)
>> {
>> return test_bit(action, &devlink->ops->supported_reload_actions);
>> }
>>
>> +static bool
>> +devlink_reload_action_limit_level_is_supported(struct devlink *devlink,
>> + enum devlink_reload_action_limit_level limit_level)
>> +{
>> + return test_bit(limit_level, &devlink->ops->supported_reload_action_limit_levels);
>> +}
> This single-use helper just grows LoC and muddies the code IMHO.
It is used again in patch 4.
>
>> static int devlink_nl_fill(struct sk_buff *msg, struct devlink *devlink,
>> enum devlink_command cmd, u32 portid,
>> u32 seq, int flags)
>> @@ -2975,22 +3008,23 @@ bool devlink_is_reload_failed(const struct devlink *devlink)
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(devlink_is_reload_failed);
>>
>> static int devlink_reload(struct devlink *devlink, struct net *dest_net,
>> - enum devlink_reload_action action, struct netlink_ext_ack *extack,
>> - unsigned long *actions_performed)
>> + enum devlink_reload_action action,
>> + enum devlink_reload_action_limit_level limit_level,
>> + struct netlink_ext_ack *extack, unsigned long *actions_performed)
>> {
>> int err;
>>
>> if (!devlink->reload_enabled)
>> return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>>
>> - err = devlink->ops->reload_down(devlink, !!dest_net, action, extack);
>> + err = devlink->ops->reload_down(devlink, !!dest_net, action, limit_level, extack);
>> if (err)
>> return err;
>>
>> if (dest_net && !net_eq(dest_net, devlink_net(devlink)))
>> devlink_reload_netns_change(devlink, dest_net);
>>
>> - err = devlink->ops->reload_up(devlink, action, extack, actions_performed);
>> + err = devlink->ops->reload_up(devlink, action, limit_level, extack, actions_performed);
>> devlink_reload_failed_set(devlink, !!err);
>> if (err)
>> return err;
>> @@ -3040,6 +3074,7 @@ devlink_nl_reload_actions_performed_fill(struct sk_buff *msg,
>>
>> static int devlink_nl_cmd_reload(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
>> {
>> + enum devlink_reload_action_limit_level limit_level;
>> struct devlink *devlink = info->user_ptr[0];
>> enum devlink_reload_action action;
>> unsigned long actions_performed;
>> @@ -3077,7 +3112,21 @@ static int devlink_nl_cmd_reload(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
>> return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> }
>>
>> - err = devlink_reload(devlink, dest_net, action, info->extack, &actions_performed);
>> + if (info->attrs[DEVLINK_ATTR_RELOAD_ACTION_LIMIT_LEVEL])
>> + limit_level = nla_get_u8(info->attrs[DEVLINK_ATTR_RELOAD_ACTION_LIMIT_LEVEL]);
>> + else
>> + limit_level = DEVLINK_RELOAD_ACTION_LIMIT_LEVEL_NONE;
>> +
>> + if (!devlink_reload_action_limit_level_is_supported(devlink, limit_level)) {
>> + NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(info->extack, "Requested limit level is not supported by the driver");
>> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> + }
>> + if (devlink_reload_combination_is_invalid(action, limit_level)) {
>> + NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(info->extack, "Requested limit level is invalid for this action");
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>> + err = devlink_reload(devlink, dest_net, action, limit_level, info->extack,
>> + &actions_performed);
>>
>> if (dest_net)
>> put_net(dest_net);
>> @@ -7154,6 +7203,7 @@ static const struct nla_policy devlink_nl_policy[DEVLINK_ATTR_MAX + 1] = {
>> [DEVLINK_ATTR_TRAP_POLICER_BURST] = { .type = NLA_U64 },
>> [DEVLINK_ATTR_PORT_FUNCTION] = { .type = NLA_NESTED },
>> [DEVLINK_ATTR_RELOAD_ACTION] = { .type = NLA_U8 },
>> + [DEVLINK_ATTR_RELOAD_ACTION_LIMIT_LEVEL] = { .type = NLA_U8 },
> range
>
>> };
>>
>> static const struct genl_ops devlink_nl_ops[] = {
>> @@ -7489,6 +7539,9 @@ static struct genl_family devlink_nl_family __ro_after_init = {
>>
>> static bool devlink_reload_actions_valid(const struct devlink_ops *ops)
>> {
>> + const struct devlink_reload_combination *comb;
>> + int i;
>> +
>> if (!devlink_reload_supported(ops)) {
>> if (WARN_ON(ops->supported_reload_actions))
>> return false;
>> @@ -7498,6 +7551,18 @@ static bool devlink_reload_actions_valid(const struct devlink_ops *ops)
>> if (WARN_ON(ops->supported_reload_actions >= BIT(__DEVLINK_RELOAD_ACTION_MAX) ||
>> ops->supported_reload_actions <= BIT(DEVLINK_RELOAD_ACTION_UNSPEC)))
>> return false;
>> +
>> + if (WARN_ON(!ops->supported_reload_action_limit_levels ||
>> + ops->supported_reload_action_limit_levels >=
>> + BIT(__DEVLINK_RELOAD_ACTION_LIMIT_LEVEL_MAX)))
>> + return false;
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(devlink_reload_invalid_combinations); i++) {
> White space, again.
Same double space, I will fix.
>
>> + comb = &devlink_reload_invalid_combinations[i];
>> + if (ops->supported_reload_actions == BIT(comb->action) &&
>> + ops->supported_reload_action_limit_levels == BIT(comb->limit_level))
>> + return false;
>> + }
>> return true;
>> }
>>
>> @@ -9793,6 +9858,7 @@ static void __net_exit devlink_pernet_pre_exit(struct net *net)
>> continue;
>> err = devlink_reload(devlink, &init_net,
>> DEVLINK_RELOAD_ACTION_DRIVER_REINIT,
>> + DEVLINK_RELOAD_ACTION_LIMIT_LEVEL_NONE,
>> NULL, &actions_performed);
>> if (err && err != -EOPNOTSUPP)
>> pr_warn("Failed to reload devlink instance into init_net\n");
Powered by blists - more mailing lists