netdev - Re: [PATCH bpf-next 5/6] bpf, selftests: use bpf_tail_call

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200924192508.GA34764@ranger.igk.intel.com>
Date:   Thu, 24 Sep 2020 21:25:08 +0200
From:   Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com>
To:     Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Cc:     ast@...nel.org, john.fastabend@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 5/6] bpf, selftests: use bpf_tail_call_static
 where appropriate

On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 08:21:26PM +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> For those locations where we use an immediate tail call map index use the
> newly added bpf_tail_call_static() helper.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
> ---
>  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_flow.c  | 12 ++++----
>  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tailcall1.c | 28 +++++++++----------
>  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tailcall2.c | 14 +++++-----
>  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tailcall3.c |  4 +--
>  .../selftests/bpf/progs/tailcall_bpf2bpf1.c   |  4 +--
>  .../selftests/bpf/progs/tailcall_bpf2bpf2.c   |  6 ++--
>  .../selftests/bpf/progs/tailcall_bpf2bpf3.c   |  6 ++--
>  .../selftests/bpf/progs/tailcall_bpf2bpf4.c   |  6 ++--
>  8 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

One nit, while you're at it, maybe it would be good to also address the
samples/bpf/sockex3_kern.c that is also using the immediate map index?

[...]