netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 2/5] bonding: rename slave to link where possible

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAKfmpSf8B5zyk9Y-0zGEOtH-03dn7UfXd12QjkBXxhsT5SV9bQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 25 Sep 2020 07:52:32 -0400
From:   Jarod Wilson <jarod@...hat.com>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@...e.cz>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Jay Vosburgh <j.vosburgh@...il.com>,
        Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@...il.com>,
        Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Davis <tadavis@....gov>, Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/5] bonding: rename slave to link where possible

On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 7:51 PM David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
>
> From: Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@...e.cz>
> Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2020 01:23:17 +0200
>
> > Even if the module parameters are deprecated and extremely inconvenient
> > as a mean of bonding configuration, I would say changing their names
> > would still count as "breaking the userspace".
>
> I totally agree.
>
> Anything user facing has to be kept around for the deprecation period,
> and that includes module parameters.

Apologies, that was a definite oversight on my part, can add them back
via similar means as num_grat_arp and num_unsol_na use currently.

-- 
Jarod Wilson
jarod@...hat.com