netdev - [RFC PATCH net-next 13/14] net: mscc: ocelot: offload redirect action to VCAP IS2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200925121855.370863-14-vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Date:   Fri, 25 Sep 2020 15:18:54 +0300
From:   Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
To:     davem@...emloft.net
Cc:     alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com, andrew@...n.ch,
        f.fainelli@...il.com, vivien.didelot@...il.com,
        horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com, joergen.andreasen@...rochip.com,
        allan.nielsen@...rochip.com, alexandru.marginean@....com,
        claudiu.manoil@....com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com
Subject: [RFC PATCH net-next 13/14] net: mscc: ocelot: offload redirect action to VCAP IS2

Via the OCELOT_MASK_MODE_REDIRECT flag put in the IS2 action vector, it
is possible to replace previous forwarding decisions with the port mask
installed in this rule.

I have studied Table 54 "MASK_MODE and PORT_MASK Combinations" from the
VSC7514 documentation and it appears to behave sanely when this rule is
installed in either lookup 0 or 1. Namely, a redirect in lookup 1 will
overwrite the forwarding decision taken by any entry in lookup 0.

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_flower.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_flower.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_flower.c
index d7e5b9051333..f42d5a3cd005 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_flower.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_flower.c
@@ -137,14 +137,15 @@ ocelot_find_vcap_filter_that_points_at(struct ocelot *ocelot, int chain)
 	return NULL;
 }
 
-static int ocelot_flower_parse_action(struct flow_cls_offload *f, bool ingress,
+static int ocelot_flower_parse_action(struct ocelot *ocelot,
+				      struct flow_cls_offload *f, bool ingress,
 				      struct ocelot_vcap_filter *filter)
 {
 	struct netlink_ext_ack *extack = f->common.extack;
 	bool allow_missing_goto_target = false;
 	const struct flow_action_entry *a;
 	enum ocelot_tag_tpid_sel tpid;
-	int i, chain;
+	int i, chain, egress_port;
 	u64 rate;
 
 	if (!flow_action_basic_hw_stats_check(&f->rule->action,
@@ -217,6 +218,27 @@ static int ocelot_flower_parse_action(struct flow_cls_offload *f, bool ingress,
 			filter->action.pol.burst = a->police.burst;
 			filter->type = OCELOT_VCAP_FILTER_OFFLOAD;
 			break;
+		case FLOW_ACTION_REDIRECT:
+			if (filter->block_id != VCAP_IS2) {
+				NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack,
+						   "Redirect action can only be offloaded to VCAP IS2");
+				return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+			}
+			if (filter->goto_target != -1) {
+				NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack,
+						   "Last action must be GOTO");
+				return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+			}
+			egress_port = ocelot->ops->netdev_to_port(a->dev);
+			if (egress_port < 0) {
+				NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack,
+						   "Destination not an ocelot port");
+				return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+			}
+			filter->action.mask_mode = OCELOT_MASK_MODE_REDIRECT;
+			filter->action.port_mask = BIT(egress_port);
+			filter->type = OCELOT_VCAP_FILTER_OFFLOAD;
+			break;
 		case FLOW_ACTION_VLAN_POP:
 			if (filter->block_id != VCAP_IS1) {
 				NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack,
@@ -528,7 +550,7 @@ static int ocelot_flower_parse(struct ocelot *ocelot, int port, bool ingress,
 
 	filter->prio = f->common.prio;
 	filter->id = f->cookie;
-	return ocelot_flower_parse_action(f, ingress, filter);
+	return ocelot_flower_parse_action(ocelot, f, ingress, filter);
 }
 
 static struct ocelot_vcap_filter
-- 
2.25.1