netdev - Re: [PATCH v6 bpf-next 6/6] selftests/bpf: add test for bpf_seq_printf

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200925012611.jebtlvcttusk3hbx@ast-mbp.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Date:   Thu, 24 Sep 2020 18:26:11 -0700
From:   Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
To:     Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@...cle.com>
Cc:     ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, andriin@...com, yhs@...com,
        linux@...musvillemoes.dk, andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com,
        pmladek@...e.com, kafai@...com, songliubraving@...com,
        john.fastabend@...il.com, kpsingh@...omium.org, shuah@...nel.org,
        rdna@...com, scott.branden@...adcom.com, quentin@...valent.com,
        cneirabustos@...il.com, jakub@...udflare.com, mingo@...hat.com,
        rostedt@...dmis.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
        acme@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 bpf-next 6/6] selftests/bpf: add test for
 bpf_seq_printf_btf helper

On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 06:46:28PM +0100, Alan Maguire wrote:
> Add a test verifying iterating over tasks and displaying BTF
> representation of data succeeds.  Note here that we do not display
> the task_struct itself, as it will overflow the PAGE_SIZE limit on seq
> data; instead we write task->fs (a struct fs_struct).

Yeah. I've tried to print task_struct before reading above comment and
it took me long time to figure out what 'read failed: Argument list too long' means.
How can we improve usability of this helper?

We can bump:
--- a/kernel/bpf/bpf_iter.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/bpf_iter.c
@@ -88,8 +88,8 @@ static ssize_t bpf_seq_read(struct file *file, char __user *buf, size_t size,
        mutex_lock(&seq->lock);

        if (!seq->buf) {
-               seq->size = PAGE_SIZE;
+               seq->size = PAGE_SIZE * 32;

to whatever number, but printing single task_struct needs ~800 lines and
~18kbytes. Humans can scroll through that much spam, but can we make it less
verbose by default somehow?
May be not in this patch set, but in the follow up?

> +SEC("iter/task")
> +int dump_task_fs_struct(struct bpf_iter__task *ctx)
> +{
> +	static const char fs_type[] = "struct fs_struct";
> +	struct seq_file *seq = ctx->meta->seq;
> +	struct task_struct *task = ctx->task;
> +	struct fs_struct *fs = (void *)0;
> +	static struct btf_ptr ptr = { };
> +	long ret;
> +
> +	if (task)
> +		fs = task->fs;
> +
> +	ptr.type = fs_type;
> +	ptr.ptr = fs;

imo the following is better:
       ptr.type_id = __builtin_btf_type_id(*fs, 1);
       ptr.ptr = fs;

> +
> +	if (ctx->meta->seq_num == 0)
> +		BPF_SEQ_PRINTF(seq, "Raw BTF fs_struct per task\n");
> +
> +	ret = bpf_seq_printf_btf(seq, &ptr, sizeof(ptr), 0);
> +	switch (ret) {
> +	case 0:
> +		tasks++;
> +		break;
> +	case -ERANGE:
> +		/* NULL task or task->fs, don't count it as an error. */
> +		break;
> +	default:
> +		seq_err = ret;
> +		break;
> +	}

Please add handling of E2BIG to this switch. Otherwise
printing large amount of tiny structs will overflow PAGE_SIZE and E2BIG
will be send to user space.
Like this:
@@ -40,6 +40,8 @@ int dump_task_fs_struct(struct bpf_iter__task *ctx)
        case -ERANGE:
                /* NULL task or task->fs, don't count it as an error. */
                break;
+       case -E2BIG:
+               return 1;

Also please change bpf_seq_read() like this:
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/bpf_iter.c b/kernel/bpf/bpf_iter.c
index 30833bbf3019..8f10e30ea0b0 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/bpf_iter.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/bpf_iter.c
@@ -88,8 +88,8 @@ static ssize_t bpf_seq_read(struct file *file, char __user *buf, size_t size,
        mutex_lock(&seq->lock);

        if (!seq->buf) {
-               seq->size = PAGE_SIZE;
-               seq->buf = kmalloc(seq->size, GFP_KERNEL);
+               seq->size = PAGE_SIZE << 3;
+               seq->buf = kvmalloc(seq->size, GFP_KERNEL);

So users can print task_struct by default.
Hopefully we will figure out how to deal with spam later.