[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200924.201014.1985667809546779432.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2020 20:10:14 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: helmut.grohne@...enta.de
Cc: nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com, alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com,
ludovic.desroches@...rochip.com, woojung.huh@...rochip.com,
UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com, andrew@...n.ch,
vivien.didelot@...il.com, f.fainelli@...il.com, kuba@...nel.org,
robh+dt@...nel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: dsa: microchip: really look for phy-mode in port
nodes
From: Helmut Grohne <helmut.grohne@...enta.de>
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2020 10:37:47 +0200
> The previous implementation failed to account for the "ports" node. The
> actual port nodes are not child nodes of the switch node, but a "ports"
> node sits in between.
>
> Fixes: edecfa98f602 ("net: dsa: microchip: look for phy-mode in port nodes")
> Signed-off-by: Helmut Grohne <helmut.grohne@...enta.de>
Applied and queued up for -stable.
> I am very sorry that I need to send a fixup. It turned out that my
> testing methodology was flawed. When I reintegrated Linus' master
> branch, I noticed that it didn't work.
You should be testing against the 'net' GIT tree, not Linus's master
branch.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists