lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2020 20:10:14 -0700 (PDT) From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> To: helmut.grohne@...enta.de Cc: nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com, alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com, ludovic.desroches@...rochip.com, woojung.huh@...rochip.com, UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com, andrew@...n.ch, vivien.didelot@...il.com, f.fainelli@...il.com, kuba@...nel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: dsa: microchip: really look for phy-mode in port nodes From: Helmut Grohne <helmut.grohne@...enta.de> Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2020 10:37:47 +0200 > The previous implementation failed to account for the "ports" node. The > actual port nodes are not child nodes of the switch node, but a "ports" > node sits in between. > > Fixes: edecfa98f602 ("net: dsa: microchip: look for phy-mode in port nodes") > Signed-off-by: Helmut Grohne <helmut.grohne@...enta.de> Applied and queued up for -stable. > I am very sorry that I need to send a fixup. It turned out that my > testing methodology was flawed. When I reintegrated Linus' master > branch, I noticed that it didn't work. You should be testing against the 'net' GIT tree, not Linus's master branch.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists