lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sat, 26 Sep 2020 10:04:13 +0530
From:   Calvin Johnson <calvin.johnson@....nxp.com>
To:     Grant Likely <grant.likely@....com>
Cc:     Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@....com>,
        Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Jon <jon@...id-run.com>,
        Cristi Sovaiala <cristian.sovaiala@....com>,
        Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@....com>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Madalin Bucur <madalin.bucur@....nxp.com>,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux.cj@...il.com,
        linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, nd <nd@....com>
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH v7 0/6] ACPI support for dpaa2 MAC driver.

Hi Grant,

On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 02:39:21PM +0100, Grant Likely wrote:
> On 15/07/2020 10:03, Calvin Johnson wrote:
> >   This patch series provides ACPI support for dpaa2 MAC driver.
> >   This also introduces ACPI mechanism to get PHYs registered on a
> >   MDIO bus and provide them to be connected to MAC.
> > 
> >   Patch "net: dpaa2-mac: Add ACPI support for DPAA2 MAC driver" depends on
> >   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lpieralisi/linux.git/commit/?h=acpi/for-next&id=c279c4cf5bcd3c55b4fb9709d9036cd1bfe3beb8
> >   Remaining patches are independent of the above patch and can be applied without
> >   any issues.
> > 
> >   Device Tree can be tested on LX2160A-RDB with the below change which is also
> > available in the above referenced patches:
> 
> Hi Calvin,
> 
> In principle, I agree with adding PHY linkage to ACPI, and I sent a comment
> about how the PHYs should be referenced. Unfortunately changing that details
> requires pretty much the entire series to be rewritten (sorry!). I won't do
> any detailed review on patches 2-6 until I see the next version.

Understood. I'll rework on the patches and send a new series.

Thanks
Calvin

Powered by blists - more mailing lists