[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87blhqkxkx.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2020 12:25:02 +0200
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
torvalds@...uxfoundation.org, paulmck@...nel.org,
willy@...radead.org, benve@...co.com, _govind@....com,
kuba@...nel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, corbet@....net,
mchehab+huawei@...nel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
bigeasy@...utronix.de, luc.vanoostenryck@...il.com,
jcliburn@...il.com, chris.snook@...il.com, vishal@...lsio.com,
jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com, intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org,
snelson@...sando.io, drivers@...sando.io, andrew@...n.ch,
hkallweit1@...il.com, linux@...linux.org.uk,
tsbogend@...ha.franken.de, linux-net-drivers@...arflare.com,
ecree@...arflare.com, mhabets@...arflare.com, jdmason@...zu.us,
dsd@...too.org, kune@...ne-taler.de, kvalo@...eaurora.org,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, arend.vanspriel@...adcom.com,
franky.lin@...adcom.com, hante.meuleman@...adcom.com,
chi-hsien.lin@...ress.com, wright.feng@...ress.com,
brcm80211-dev-list.pdl@...adcom.com,
brcm80211-dev-list@...ress.com, stas.yakovlev@...il.com,
stf_xl@...pl, johannes.berg@...el.com, emmanuel.grumbach@...el.com,
luciano.coelho@...el.com, linuxwifi@...el.com
Subject: Re: [patch 00/35] net: in_interrupt() cleanup and fixes
On Sun, Sep 27 2020 at 13:57, David Miller wrote:
> From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2020 21:48:46 +0200
>
>> in the discussion about preempt count consistency accross kernel configurations:
>
> Please respin this against net-next, some of the patches in here are already
> in net-next (the wireless debug macro one) and even after that the series
> doesn't build:
Will do.
> drivers/net/ethernet/cisco/enic/enic_main.c: In function ‘enic_reset’:
> drivers/net/ethernet/cisco/enic/enic_main.c:2315:2: error: implicit declaration of function ‘enic_set_api_state’; did you mean ‘enic_set_api_busy’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> 2315 | enic_set_api_state(enic, true);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> | enic_set_api_busy
> At top level:
> drivers/net/ethernet/cisco/enic/enic_main.c:2298:13: warning: ‘enic_set_api_busy’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
> 2298 | static void enic_set_api_busy(struct enic *enic, bool busy)
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Duh, not sure how I managed that. Sorry. will fix and rebase.
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists