[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200928175908.318502-7-anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2020 10:58:59 -0700
From: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>
To: davem@...emloft.net
Cc: Andre Guedes <andre.guedes@...el.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
nhorman@...hat.com, sassmann@...hat.com,
anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com, Aaron Brown <aaron.f.brown@...el.com>
Subject: [net-next 06/15] igc: Remove timeout check from ptp_tx work
From: Andre Guedes <andre.guedes@...el.com>
The Tx timestamp timeout is already checked by the watchdog_task
which runs periodically. In addition to that, from the ptp_tx work
perspective, if __IGC_PTP_TX_IN_PROGRESS flag is set we always want
handle the timestamp stored in hardware and update the skb. So remove
the timeout check in igc_ptp_tx_work() function.
Signed-off-by: Andre Guedes <andre.guedes@...el.com>
Tested-by: Aaron Brown <aaron.f.brown@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_ptp.c | 6 ------
1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_ptp.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_ptp.c
index 791f406f1314..61852c99815d 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_ptp.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_ptp.c
@@ -422,12 +422,6 @@ static void igc_ptp_tx_work(struct work_struct *work)
if (!test_bit(__IGC_PTP_TX_IN_PROGRESS, &adapter->state))
return;
- if (time_is_before_jiffies(adapter->ptp_tx_start +
- IGC_PTP_TX_TIMEOUT)) {
- igc_ptp_tx_timeout(adapter);
- return;
- }
-
tsynctxctl = rd32(IGC_TSYNCTXCTL);
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!(tsynctxctl & IGC_TSYNCTXCTL_TXTT_0)))
return;
--
2.26.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists