[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <DB8PR04MB67953242A9B727F851B7466CE6350@DB8PR04MB6795.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2020 05:23:26 +0000
From: Joakim Zhang <qiangqing.zhang@....com>
To: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>,
"linux-can@...r.kernel.org" <linux-can@...r.kernel.org>
CC: dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH V2 1/3] can: flexcan: initialize all flexcan memory for
ECC function
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joakim Zhang <qiangqing.zhang@....com>
> Sent: 2020年9月28日 10:29
> To: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>; linux-can@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>; netdev@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: RE: [PATCH V2 1/3] can: flexcan: initialize all flexcan memory for ECC
> function
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
> > Sent: 2020年9月28日 3:58
> > To: Joakim Zhang <qiangqing.zhang@....com>; linux-can@...r.kernel.org
> > Cc: dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>; netdev@...r.kernel.org
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/3] can: flexcan: initialize all flexcan
> > memory for ECC function
> >
> > On 9/27/20 6:07 PM, Joakim Zhang wrote:
> > [...]
> >
> > > +static void flexcan_init_ram(struct net_device *dev) {
> > > + struct flexcan_priv *priv = netdev_priv(dev);
> > > + struct flexcan_regs __iomem *regs = priv->regs;
> > > + u32 reg_ctrl2;
> > > + int i;
> > > +
> > > + /* 11.8.3.13 Detection and correction of memory errors:
> > > + * CTRL2[WRMFRZ] grants write access to all memory positions that
> > > + * require initialization, ranging from 0x080 to 0xADF and
> > > + * from 0xF28 to 0xFFF when the CAN FD feature is enabled.
> > > + * The RXMGMASK, RX14MASK, RX15MASK, and RXFGMASK
> registers
> > need to
> > > + * be initialized as well. MCR[RFEN] must not be set during memory
> > > + * initialization.
> > > + */
> > > + reg_ctrl2 = priv->read(®s->ctrl2);
> > > + reg_ctrl2 |= FLEXCAN_CTRL2_WRMFRZ;
> > > + priv->write(reg_ctrl2, ®s->ctrl2);
> > > +
> > > + for (i = 0; i < ram_init[0].len; i++)
> > > + priv->write(0, (void __iomem *)regs + ram_init[0].offset +
> > > +sizeof(u32) * i);
> >
> > As the write function only does endian conversion, and you're writing 0 here.
> > What about using iowrite32_rep() and get rid of the for loop?
>
> Thanks for this point, I will update in next version.
Ahhh.. I check iowrite32_rep() writes a buf to single address, no shift for address.
I prefer to use memset_io() here to initialize a block of io memory. What do you think?
Best Regards,
Joakim Zhang
> Best Regards,
> Joakim Zhang
> > Marc
> >
> > --
> > Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde |
> > Embedded Linux | https://www.pengutronix.de |
> > Vertretung West/Dortmund | Phone: +49-231-2826-924 |
> > Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Powered by blists - more mailing lists