netdev - Re: [PATCH v2] ath10k: sdio: remove redundant check in for loop

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87wo0ddo5b.fsf@codeaurora.org>
Date:   Tue, 29 Sep 2020 10:42:56 +0300
From:   Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>
To:     Alex Dewar <alex.dewar90@...il.com>
Cc:     Julian Calaby <julian.calaby@...il.com>,
        linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, ath10k@...ts.infradead.org,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ath10k: sdio: remove redundant check in for loop

Alex Dewar <alex.dewar90@...il.com> writes:

>> I agree. Anyone can come up with a patch?
>
> Hi Kalle,
>
> I was thinking of having a go at this. Have you applied the v2 of this
> patch yet though? I couldn't see it in wireless-drivers-next. I just
> don't want to have to rebase the patch if you were going to apply this
> v2.

I have not applied this yet. It's in my pending branch but I can easily
drop it. Just let me know what you prefer.

-- 
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/

https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches