[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200929112025.3759284-2-vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2020 14:20:24 +0300
From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
To: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: xiaoliang.yang_1@....com, hongbo.wang@....com,
UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com, claudiu.manoil@....com,
alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com, andrew@...n.ch,
vivien.didelot@...il.com, f.fainelli@...il.com, kuba@...nel.org
Subject: [PATCH net 1/2] net: dsa: felix: fix incorrect action offsets for VCAP IS2
The port mask width was larger than the actual number of ports, and
therefore, all fields following this one were also shifted by the number
of excess bits. But the driver doesn't use the REW_OP, SMAC_REPLACE_ENA
or ACL_ID bits from the action vector, so the bug was inconsequential.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
---
drivers/net/dsa/ocelot/felix_vsc9959.c | 12 ++++++------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/ocelot/felix_vsc9959.c b/drivers/net/dsa/ocelot/felix_vsc9959.c
index 2e9270c00096..af651ae03572 100644
--- a/drivers/net/dsa/ocelot/felix_vsc9959.c
+++ b/drivers/net/dsa/ocelot/felix_vsc9959.c
@@ -686,12 +686,12 @@ static struct vcap_field vsc9959_vcap_is2_actions[] = {
[VCAP_IS2_ACT_POLICE_ENA] = { 9, 1},
[VCAP_IS2_ACT_POLICE_IDX] = { 10, 9},
[VCAP_IS2_ACT_POLICE_VCAP_ONLY] = { 19, 1},
- [VCAP_IS2_ACT_PORT_MASK] = { 20, 11},
- [VCAP_IS2_ACT_REW_OP] = { 31, 9},
- [VCAP_IS2_ACT_SMAC_REPLACE_ENA] = { 40, 1},
- [VCAP_IS2_ACT_RSV] = { 41, 2},
- [VCAP_IS2_ACT_ACL_ID] = { 43, 6},
- [VCAP_IS2_ACT_HIT_CNT] = { 49, 32},
+ [VCAP_IS2_ACT_PORT_MASK] = { 20, 6},
+ [VCAP_IS2_ACT_REW_OP] = { 26, 9},
+ [VCAP_IS2_ACT_SMAC_REPLACE_ENA] = { 35, 1},
+ [VCAP_IS2_ACT_RSV] = { 36, 2},
+ [VCAP_IS2_ACT_ACL_ID] = { 38, 6},
+ [VCAP_IS2_ACT_HIT_CNT] = { 44, 32},
};
static const struct vcap_props vsc9959_vcap_props[] = {
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists