netdev - [PATCH bpf-next] selftests/bpf_iter: don't fail test due to missing __builtin_btf_type

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 29 Sep 2020 14:30:04 +0200
From:   Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>
To:     daniel@...earbox.net, ast@...com
Cc:     Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>,
        bpf@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@...cle.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next] selftests/bpf_iter: don't fail test due to missing __builtin_btf_type_id

The new test for task iteration in bpf_iter checks (in do_btf_read()) if it
should be skipped due to missing __builtin_btf_type_id. However, this
'skip' verdict is not propagated to the caller, so the parent test will
still fail. Fix this by also skipping the rest of the parent test if the
skip condition was reached.

Fixes: b72091bd4ee4 ("selftests/bpf: Add test for bpf_seq_printf_btf helper")
Signed-off-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_iter.c | 12 +++++++++---
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_iter.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_iter.c
index af15630a24dd..448885b95eed 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_iter.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_iter.c
@@ -172,17 +172,18 @@ static void test_task_file(void)
 
 static char taskbuf[TASKBUFSZ];
 
-static void do_btf_read(struct bpf_iter_task_btf *skel)
+static int do_btf_read(struct bpf_iter_task_btf *skel)
 {
 	struct bpf_program *prog = skel->progs.dump_task_struct;
 	struct bpf_iter_task_btf__bss *bss = skel->bss;
 	int iter_fd = -1, len = 0, bufleft = TASKBUFSZ;
 	struct bpf_link *link;
 	char *buf = taskbuf;
+	int ret = 0;
 
 	link = bpf_program__attach_iter(prog, NULL);
 	if (CHECK(IS_ERR(link), "attach_iter", "attach_iter failed\n"))
-		return;
+		return ret;
 
 	iter_fd = bpf_iter_create(bpf_link__fd(link));
 	if (CHECK(iter_fd < 0, "create_iter", "create_iter failed\n"))
@@ -198,6 +199,7 @@ static void do_btf_read(struct bpf_iter_task_btf *skel)
 
 	if (bss->skip) {
 		printf("%s:SKIP:no __builtin_btf_type_id\n", __func__);
+		ret = 1;
 		test__skip();
 		goto free_link;
 	}
@@ -212,12 +214,14 @@ static void do_btf_read(struct bpf_iter_task_btf *skel)
 	if (iter_fd > 0)
 		close(iter_fd);
 	bpf_link__destroy(link);
+	return ret;
 }
 
 static void test_task_btf(void)
 {
 	struct bpf_iter_task_btf__bss *bss;
 	struct bpf_iter_task_btf *skel;
+	int ret;
 
 	skel = bpf_iter_task_btf__open_and_load();
 	if (CHECK(!skel, "bpf_iter_task_btf__open_and_load",
@@ -226,7 +230,9 @@ static void test_task_btf(void)
 
 	bss = skel->bss;
 
-	do_btf_read(skel);
+	ret = do_btf_read(skel);
+	if (ret)
+		goto cleanup;
 
 	if (CHECK(bss->tasks == 0, "check if iterated over tasks",
 		  "no task iteration, did BPF program run?\n"))
-- 
2.28.0