netdev - RE: [PATCH V3 1/3] can: flexcan: initialize all flexcan memory for ECC function

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <DB8PR04MB679573BB9086D40522C7871EE6320@DB8PR04MB6795.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Tue, 29 Sep 2020 11:36:16 +0000
From:   Joakim Zhang <qiangqing.zhang@....com>
To:     Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>,
        "linux-can@...r.kernel.org" <linux-can@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH V3 1/3] can: flexcan: initialize all flexcan memory for
 ECC function


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
> Sent: 2020年9月29日 19:31
> To: Joakim Zhang <qiangqing.zhang@....com>; linux-can@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org; dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 1/3] can: flexcan: initialize all flexcan memory for ECC
> function
> 
> On 9/29/20 1:27 PM, Joakim Zhang wrote:
> > [...]
> >>> +	reg_ctrl2 = priv->read(&regs->ctrl2);
> >>> +	reg_ctrl2 |= FLEXCAN_CTRL2_WRMFRZ;
> >>> +	priv->write(reg_ctrl2, &regs->ctrl2);
> >>> +
> >>> +	/* ranging from 0x0080 to 0x0ADF, ram details as below list:
> >>> +	 * 0x0080--0x087F:	128 MBs
> >>> +	 * 0x0880--0x0A7F:	128 RXIMRs
> >>> +	 * 0x0A80--0x0A97:	6 RXFIRs
> >>> +	 * 0x0A98--0x0A9F:	Reserved
> >>> +	 * 0x0AA0--0x0AA3:	RXMGMASK
> >>> +	 * 0x0AA4--0x0AA7:	RXFGMASK
> >>> +	 * 0x0AA8--0x0AAB:	RX14MASK
> >>> +	 * 0x0AAC--0x0AAF:	RX15MASK
> >>> +	 * 0x0AB0--0x0ABF:	TX_SMB
> >>> +	 * 0x0AC0--0x0ACF:	RX_SMB0
> >>> +	 * 0x0AD0--0x0ADF:	RX_SMB1
> >>
> >> I don't like to have the register definition here *again), we have
> >> struct flexcan_regs for this.
> >
> > Do you mean still move these register definitions into flexcan_regs, right?
> 
> ack
> 
> >>> +	 */
> >>> +	memset_io((void __iomem *)regs + 0x80, 0, 0xadf - 0x80 + 1);
> >>
> >> why the cast?
> >
> > Yes, no need, will remove it.
> >
> >> Can you use the "&regs->foo - &regs->bar + x" to get the length for
> >> the memset?
> >
> > After move above register definition into flexcan_regs, I can change
> > to use this way to get the length for the memset_io.
> 
> ACK
> 
> >>> +
> >>> +	/* ranging from 0x0F28 to 0x0FFF when CAN FD feature is enabled,
> >>> +	 * ram details as below list:
> >>> +	 * 0x0F28--0x0F6F:	TX_SMB_FD
> >>> +	 * 0x0F70--0x0FB7:	RX_SMB0_FD
> >>> +	 * 0x0FB8--0x0FFF:	RX_SMB0_FD
> >>> +	 */
> >>> +	memset_io((void __iomem *)regs + 0xf28, 0, 0xfff - 0xf28 + 1);
> >>
> >> same here
> >
> > Will change.
> 
> tnx
> 
> > Hi Marc, I'm going on holiday from tomorrow, so I would delay to send
> > out a
> > V4 to review until I come back, sorry for this. Thanks for your
> > comments of
> > "can: flexcan: add CAN wakeup function for i.MX8", will rework the
> > patch later.
> 
> Fine with me, I think we can push these changes via net to v5.10 after the v5.9
> release is out.

I don't know whether to rush into V5.10, since I will back on Oct 12th. If you have such plan, I will rework the patch right now.
After I test, I will send out the V4.

Best Regards,
Joakim Zhang
> Marc
> 
> --
> Pengutronix e.K.                 | Marc Kleine-Budde           |
> Embedded Linux                   | https://www.pengutronix.de  |
> Vertretung West/Dortmund         | Phone: +49-231-2826-924     |
> Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |