[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200929002228.5c72zt7vrdv3ognx@ast-mbp.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2020 17:22:28 -0700
From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
To: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Eelco Chaudron <echaudro@...hat.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...omium.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v9 11/11] selftests: Remove fmod_ret from
test_overhead
On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 11:25:11PM +0200, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_overhead.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_overhead.c
> index 42403d088abc..abb7344b531f 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_overhead.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_overhead.c
> @@ -39,10 +39,4 @@ int BPF_PROG(prog5, struct task_struct *tsk, const char *buf, bool exec)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -SEC("fmod_ret/__set_task_comm")
> -int BPF_PROG(prog6, struct task_struct *tsk, const char *buf, bool exec)
> -{
> - return !tsk;
> -}
I've applied patches 1,2,3,11. Thanks
Powered by blists - more mailing lists