netdev - [RFC PATCH v2 net-next 13/21] net: mscc: ocelot: look up the filters in flower_stats() and flower

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200929101016.3743530-14-vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Date:   Tue, 29 Sep 2020 13:10:08 +0300
From:   Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
To:     davem@...emloft.net
Cc:     alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com, andrew@...n.ch,
        f.fainelli@...il.com, vivien.didelot@...il.com,
        horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com, joergen.andreasen@...rochip.com,
        allan.nielsen@...rochip.com, alexandru.marginean@....com,
        claudiu.manoil@....com, xiaoliang.yang_1@....com,
        hongbo.wang@....com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, kuba@...nel.org,
        jiri@...nulli.us, idosch@...sch.org, UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com
Subject: [RFC PATCH v2 net-next 13/21] net: mscc: ocelot: look up the filters in flower_stats() and flower_destroy()

Currently a new filter is created, containing just enough correct
information to be able to call ocelot_vcap_block_find_filter_by_index()
on it.

This will be limiting us in the future, when we'll have more metadata
associated with a filter, which will matter in the stats() and destroy()
callbacks, and which we can't make up on the spot. For example, we'll
start "offloading" some dummy tc filter entries for the TCAM skeleton,
but we won't actually be adding them to the hardware, or to block->rules.
So, it makes sense to avoid deleting those rules too. That's the kind of
thing which is difficult to determine unless we look up the real filter.

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
---
Changes in v2:
None.

 drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_flower.c | 23 ++++++++++++++---------
 drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_vcap.c   |  8 ++++----
 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_flower.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_flower.c
index 542c2f3172f6..00b02b76164e 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_flower.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_flower.c
@@ -237,28 +237,33 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ocelot_cls_flower_replace);
 int ocelot_cls_flower_destroy(struct ocelot *ocelot, int port,
 			      struct flow_cls_offload *f, bool ingress)
 {
-	struct ocelot_vcap_filter filter;
+	struct ocelot_vcap_block *block = &ocelot->block;
+	struct ocelot_vcap_filter *filter;
 
-	filter.prio = f->common.prio;
-	filter.id = f->cookie;
+	filter = ocelot_vcap_block_find_filter_by_id(block, f->cookie);
+	if (!filter)
+		return 0;
 
-	return ocelot_vcap_filter_del(ocelot, &filter);
+	return ocelot_vcap_filter_del(ocelot, filter);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ocelot_cls_flower_destroy);
 
 int ocelot_cls_flower_stats(struct ocelot *ocelot, int port,
 			    struct flow_cls_offload *f, bool ingress)
 {
-	struct ocelot_vcap_filter filter;
+	struct ocelot_vcap_block *block = &ocelot->block;
+	struct ocelot_vcap_filter *filter;
 	int ret;
 
-	filter.prio = f->common.prio;
-	filter.id = f->cookie;
-	ret = ocelot_vcap_filter_stats_update(ocelot, &filter);
+	filter = ocelot_vcap_block_find_filter_by_id(block, f->cookie);
+	if (!filter)
+		return 0;
+
+	ret = ocelot_vcap_filter_stats_update(ocelot, filter);
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
-	flow_stats_update(&f->stats, 0x0, filter.stats.pkts, 0, 0x0,
+	flow_stats_update(&f->stats, 0x0, filter->stats.pkts, 0, 0x0,
 			  FLOW_ACTION_HW_STATS_IMMEDIATE);
 	return 0;
 }
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_vcap.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_vcap.c
index 6c43c1de1d54..8bb03aa57811 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_vcap.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_vcap.c
@@ -956,7 +956,7 @@ int ocelot_vcap_filter_stats_update(struct ocelot *ocelot,
 				    struct ocelot_vcap_filter *filter)
 {
 	struct ocelot_vcap_block *block = &ocelot->block;
-	struct ocelot_vcap_filter *tmp;
+	struct ocelot_vcap_filter tmp;
 	int index;
 
 	index = ocelot_vcap_block_get_filter_index(block, filter);
@@ -966,9 +966,9 @@ int ocelot_vcap_filter_stats_update(struct ocelot *ocelot,
 	vcap_entry_get(ocelot, filter, index);
 
 	/* After we get the result we need to clear the counters */
-	tmp = ocelot_vcap_block_find_filter_by_index(block, index);
-	tmp->stats.pkts = 0;
-	is2_entry_set(ocelot, index, tmp);
+	tmp = *filter;
+	tmp.stats.pkts = 0;
+	is2_entry_set(ocelot, index, &tmp);
 
 	return 0;
 }
-- 
2.25.1