[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200929101016.3743530-19-vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2020 13:10:13 +0300
From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
To: davem@...emloft.net
Cc: alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com, andrew@...n.ch,
f.fainelli@...il.com, vivien.didelot@...il.com,
horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com, joergen.andreasen@...rochip.com,
allan.nielsen@...rochip.com, alexandru.marginean@....com,
claudiu.manoil@....com, xiaoliang.yang_1@....com,
hongbo.wang@....com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, kuba@...nel.org,
jiri@...nulli.us, idosch@...sch.org, UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com
Subject: [RFC PATCH v2 net-next 18/21] net: mscc: ocelot: only install TCAM entries into a specific lookup and PAG
We were installing TCAM rules with the LOOKUP field as unmasked, meaning
that all entries were matching on all lookups. Now that lookups are
exposed as individual chains, let's make the LOOKUP explicit when
offloading TCAM entries.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
---
Changes in v2:
None.
drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_flower.c | 10 ++++++----
drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_vcap.c | 6 +++++-
2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_flower.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_flower.c
index 3808a0762919..ca7cb8f2496f 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_flower.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_flower.c
@@ -164,6 +164,8 @@ static int ocelot_flower_parse_action(struct flow_cls_offload *f, bool ingress,
}
if (filter->block_id == VCAP_IS1 || filter->block_id == VCAP_IS2)
filter->lookup = ocelot_chain_to_lookup(chain);
+ if (filter->block_id == VCAP_IS2)
+ filter->pag = ocelot_chain_to_pag(chain);
filter->goto_target = -1;
filter->type = OCELOT_VCAP_FILTER_DUMMY;
@@ -205,9 +207,10 @@ static int ocelot_flower_parse_action(struct flow_cls_offload *f, bool ingress,
filter->type = OCELOT_VCAP_FILTER_OFFLOAD;
break;
case FLOW_ACTION_POLICE:
- if (filter->block_id != VCAP_IS2) {
+ if (filter->block_id != VCAP_IS2 ||
+ filter->lookup != 0) {
NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack,
- "Police action can only be offloaded to VCAP IS2");
+ "Police action can only be offloaded to VCAP IS2 lookup 0");
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
}
if (filter->goto_target != -1) {
@@ -276,8 +279,7 @@ static int ocelot_flower_parse_action(struct flow_cls_offload *f, bool ingress,
case FLOW_ACTION_GOTO:
filter->goto_target = a->chain_index;
- if (filter->block_id == VCAP_IS1 &&
- ocelot_chain_to_lookup(chain) == 2) {
+ if (filter->block_id == VCAP_IS1 && filter->lookup == 2) {
int pag = ocelot_chain_to_pag(filter->goto_target);
filter->action.pag_override_mask = 0xff;
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_vcap.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_vcap.c
index 59ed25b8b5a1..958d8263bcdb 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_vcap.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_vcap.c
@@ -350,7 +350,10 @@ static void is2_entry_set(struct ocelot *ocelot, int ix,
data.type = IS2_ACTION_TYPE_NORMAL;
- vcap_key_set(vcap, &data, VCAP_IS2_HK_PAG, 0, 0);
+ vcap_key_set(vcap, &data, VCAP_IS2_HK_PAG, filter->pag, 0xff);
+ vcap_key_bit_set(vcap, &data, VCAP_IS2_HK_FIRST,
+ (filter->lookup == 0) ? OCELOT_VCAP_BIT_1 :
+ OCELOT_VCAP_BIT_0);
vcap_key_set(vcap, &data, VCAP_IS2_HK_IGR_PORT_MASK, 0,
~filter->ingress_port_mask);
vcap_key_bit_set(vcap, &data, VCAP_IS2_HK_FIRST, OCELOT_VCAP_BIT_ANY);
@@ -671,6 +674,7 @@ static void is1_entry_set(struct ocelot *ocelot, int ix,
if (filter->prio != 0)
data.tg |= data.tg_value;
+ vcap_key_set(vcap, &data, VCAP_IS1_HK_LOOKUP, filter->lookup, 0x3);
vcap_key_set(vcap, &data, VCAP_IS1_HK_IGR_PORT_MASK, 0,
~filter->ingress_port_mask);
vcap_key_bit_set(vcap, &data, VCAP_IS1_HK_L2_MC, filter->dmac_mc);
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists