netdev - [RFC PATCH v2 net-next 12/21] net: mscc: ocelot: add a new ocelot_vcap_block_find_filter_by

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200929101016.3743530-13-vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Date:   Tue, 29 Sep 2020 13:10:07 +0300
From:   Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
To:     davem@...emloft.net
Cc:     alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com, andrew@...n.ch,
        f.fainelli@...il.com, vivien.didelot@...il.com,
        horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com, joergen.andreasen@...rochip.com,
        allan.nielsen@...rochip.com, alexandru.marginean@....com,
        claudiu.manoil@....com, xiaoliang.yang_1@....com,
        hongbo.wang@....com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, kuba@...nel.org,
        jiri@...nulli.us, idosch@...sch.org, UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com
Subject: [RFC PATCH v2 net-next 12/21] net: mscc: ocelot: add a new ocelot_vcap_block_find_filter_by_id function

And rename the existing find to ocelot_vcap_block_find_filter_by_index.
The index is the position in the TCAM, and the id is the flow cookie
given by tc.

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
---
Changes in v2:
None.

 drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_vcap.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++-------
 drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_vcap.h |  2 ++
 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_vcap.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_vcap.c
index 67fb516e343b..6c43c1de1d54 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_vcap.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_vcap.c
@@ -731,8 +731,8 @@ static int ocelot_vcap_block_get_filter_index(struct ocelot_vcap_block *block,
 }
 
 static struct ocelot_vcap_filter*
-ocelot_vcap_block_find_filter(struct ocelot_vcap_block *block,
-			      int index)
+ocelot_vcap_block_find_filter_by_index(struct ocelot_vcap_block *block,
+				       int index)
 {
 	struct ocelot_vcap_filter *tmp;
 	int i = 0;
@@ -746,6 +746,18 @@ ocelot_vcap_block_find_filter(struct ocelot_vcap_block *block,
 	return NULL;
 }
 
+struct ocelot_vcap_filter *
+ocelot_vcap_block_find_filter_by_id(struct ocelot_vcap_block *block, int id)
+{
+	struct ocelot_vcap_filter *filter;
+
+	list_for_each_entry(filter, &block->rules, list)
+		if (filter->id == id)
+			return filter;
+
+	return NULL;
+}
+
 /* If @on=false, then SNAP, ARP, IP and OAM frames will not match on keys based
  * on destination and source MAC addresses, but only on higher-level protocol
  * information. The only frame types to match on keys containing MAC addresses
@@ -827,7 +839,7 @@ ocelot_exclusive_mac_etype_filter_rules(struct ocelot *ocelot,
 	if (ocelot_vcap_is_problematic_mac_etype(filter)) {
 		/* Search for any non-MAC_ETYPE rules on the port */
 		for (i = 0; i < block->count; i++) {
-			tmp = ocelot_vcap_block_find_filter(block, i);
+			tmp = ocelot_vcap_block_find_filter_by_index(block, i);
 			if (tmp->ingress_port_mask & filter->ingress_port_mask &&
 			    ocelot_vcap_is_problematic_non_mac_etype(tmp))
 				return false;
@@ -839,7 +851,7 @@ ocelot_exclusive_mac_etype_filter_rules(struct ocelot *ocelot,
 	} else if (ocelot_vcap_is_problematic_non_mac_etype(filter)) {
 		/* Search for any MAC_ETYPE rules on the port */
 		for (i = 0; i < block->count; i++) {
-			tmp = ocelot_vcap_block_find_filter(block, i);
+			tmp = ocelot_vcap_block_find_filter_by_index(block, i);
 			if (tmp->ingress_port_mask & filter->ingress_port_mask &&
 			    ocelot_vcap_is_problematic_mac_etype(tmp))
 				return false;
@@ -878,7 +890,7 @@ int ocelot_vcap_filter_add(struct ocelot *ocelot,
 	for (i = block->count - 1; i > index; i--) {
 		struct ocelot_vcap_filter *tmp;
 
-		tmp = ocelot_vcap_block_find_filter(block, i);
+		tmp = ocelot_vcap_block_find_filter_by_index(block, i);
 		is2_entry_set(ocelot, i, tmp);
 	}
 
@@ -930,7 +942,7 @@ int ocelot_vcap_filter_del(struct ocelot *ocelot,
 	for (i = index; i < block->count; i++) {
 		struct ocelot_vcap_filter *tmp;
 
-		tmp = ocelot_vcap_block_find_filter(block, i);
+		tmp = ocelot_vcap_block_find_filter_by_index(block, i);
 		is2_entry_set(ocelot, i, tmp);
 	}
 
@@ -954,7 +966,7 @@ int ocelot_vcap_filter_stats_update(struct ocelot *ocelot,
 	vcap_entry_get(ocelot, filter, index);
 
 	/* After we get the result we need to clear the counters */
-	tmp = ocelot_vcap_block_find_filter(block, index);
+	tmp = ocelot_vcap_block_find_filter_by_index(block, index);
 	tmp->stats.pkts = 0;
 	is2_entry_set(ocelot, index, tmp);
 
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_vcap.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_vcap.h
index b1e77fd874b4..9e301ebb5c4f 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_vcap.h
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_vcap.h
@@ -237,6 +237,8 @@ int ocelot_vcap_filter_del(struct ocelot *ocelot,
 			   struct ocelot_vcap_filter *rule);
 int ocelot_vcap_filter_stats_update(struct ocelot *ocelot,
 				    struct ocelot_vcap_filter *rule);
+struct ocelot_vcap_filter *
+ocelot_vcap_block_find_filter_by_id(struct ocelot_vcap_block *block, int id);
 
 int ocelot_vcap_init(struct ocelot *ocelot);
 
-- 
2.25.1