lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <df1ad702-ab31-e027-e711-46d09f8fa095@pensando.io>
Date:   Tue, 29 Sep 2020 15:44:08 -0700
From:   Shannon Nelson <snelson@...sando.io>
To:     Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Jakub Kicinski <kubakici@...pl>
Subject: Re: [iproute2-next v1] devlink: display elapsed time during flash
 update

On 9/29/20 2:56 PM, Jacob Keller wrote:
> For some devices, updating the flash can take significant time during
> operations where no status can meaningfully be reported. This can be
> somewhat confusing to a user who sees devlink appear to hang on the
> terminal waiting for the device to update.
>
> Recent changes to the kernel interface allow such long running commands
> to provide a timeout value indicating some upper bound on how long the
> relevant action could take.
>
> Provide a ticking counter of the time elapsed since the previous status
> message in order to make it clear that the program is not simply stuck.
>
> Display this message whenever the status message from the kernel
> indicates a timeout value. Additionally also display the message if
> we've received no status for more than couple of seconds. If we elapse
> more than the timeout provided by the status message, replace the
> timeout display with "timeout reached".
>
> Signed-off-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>
> ---
>

Thanks, Jake.  In general this seems to work pretty well.  One thing, 
tho'...

Our fw download is slow (I won't go into the reasons here) so we're 
clicking through the Download x% over maybe 100+ seconds.  Since we send 
an update every 3% or so, we end up seeing the ( 0m 3s ) pop up and stay 
there the whole time, looking a little odd:

     ./iproute2-5.8.0/devlink/devlink dev flash pci/0000:b5:00.0 file 
ionic/dsc_fw_1.15.0-150.tar
     Preparing to flash
     Downloading  37% ( 0m 3s )
   ...
     Downloading  59% ( 0m 3s )
   ...
     Downloading  83% ( 0m 3s )

And at the end we see:

     Preparing to flash
     Downloading 100% ( 0m 3s )
     Installing ( 0m 43s : 25m 0s )
     Selecting ( 0m 5s : 0m 30s )
     Flash done

I can have the driver do updates more often in order to stay under the 3 
second limit and hide this, but it looks a bit funky, especially at the 
end where I know that 100% took a lot longer than 3 seconds.

sln


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ