netdev - Re: [PATCH] [v2] wireless: Initial driver submission for pureLiFi devices

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200930104459.GO3094@unreal>
Date:   Wed, 30 Sep 2020 13:44:59 +0300
From:   Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
To:     Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
Cc:     Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
        Srinivasan Raju <srini.raju@...elifi.com>,
        mostafa.afgani@...elifi.com,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [v2] wireless: Initial driver submission for pureLiFi
 devices

On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 12:11:24PM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Wed, 2020-09-30 at 12:55 +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 11:01:27AM +0300, Kalle Valo wrote:
> > > Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org> writes:
> > >
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/purelifi/Kconfig
> > > > b/drivers/net/wireless/purelifi/Kconfig
> > > > > new file mode 100644
> > > > > index 000000000000..ff05eaf0a8d4
> > > > > --- /dev/null
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/purelifi/Kconfig
> > > > > @@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
> > > > > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > > > > +config WLAN_VENDOR_PURELIFI
> > > > > +	bool "pureLiFi devices"
> > > > > +	default y
> > > >
> > > > "N" is preferred default.
> > >
> > > In most cases that's true, but for WLAN_VENDOR_ configs 'default y'
> > > should be used. It's the same as with NET_VENDOR_.
> >
> > I would like to challenge it, why is that?
> > Why do I need to set "N", every time new vendor upstreams its code?
>
> You don't. The WLAN_VENDOR_* settings are not supposed to affect the
> build, just the Kconfig visibility.

Which is important to me, I'm keeping .config as minimal as possible
to simplify comparison between various builds.

Thanks