netdev - Re: [RFC PATCH 06/24] vhost-vdpa: switch to use vhost-vdpa specific IOTLB

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 30 Sep 2020 15:02:02 +0300
From:   Eli Cohen <elic@...dia.com>
To:     Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
CC:     <mst@...hat.com>, <lulu@...hat.com>, <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
        <virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
        <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <rob.miller@...adcom.com>, <lingshan.zhu@...el.com>,
        <eperezma@...hat.com>, <hanand@...inx.com>,
        <mhabets@...arflare.com>, <elic@...dia.com>, <amorenoz@...hat.com>,
        <maxime.coquelin@...hat.com>, <stefanha@...hat.com>,
        <sgarzare@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 06/24] vhost-vdpa: switch to use vhost-vdpa specific
 IOTLB

On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 11:21:07AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> To ease the implementation of per group ASID support for vDPA
> device. This patch switches to use a vhost-vdpa specific IOTLB to
> avoid the unnecessary refactoring of the vhost core.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
> ---
>  drivers/vhost/vdpa.c | 14 ++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c b/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c
> index 74bef1c15a70..ec3c94f706c1 100644
> --- a/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c
> +++ b/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c
> @@ -40,6 +40,7 @@ struct vhost_vdpa {
>  	struct vhost_virtqueue *vqs;
>  	struct completion completion;
>  	struct vdpa_device *vdpa;
> +	struct vhost_iotlb *iotlb;
>  	struct device dev;
>  	struct cdev cdev;
>  	atomic_t opened;
> @@ -514,12 +515,11 @@ static void vhost_vdpa_iotlb_unmap(struct vhost_vdpa *v,
>  
>  static void vhost_vdpa_iotlb_free(struct vhost_vdpa *v)
>  {
> -	struct vhost_dev *dev = &v->vdev;
> -	struct vhost_iotlb *iotlb = dev->iotlb;
> +	struct vhost_iotlb *iotlb = v->iotlb;
>  
>  	vhost_vdpa_iotlb_unmap(v, iotlb, 0ULL, 0ULL - 1);
> -	kfree(dev->iotlb);
> -	dev->iotlb = NULL;
> +	kfree(v->iotlb);
> +	v->iotlb = NULL;
>  }
>  
>  static int perm_to_iommu_flags(u32 perm)
> @@ -681,7 +681,7 @@ static int vhost_vdpa_process_iotlb_msg(struct vhost_dev *dev,
>  	struct vhost_vdpa *v = container_of(dev, struct vhost_vdpa, vdev);
>  	struct vdpa_device *vdpa = v->vdpa;
>  	const struct vdpa_config_ops *ops = vdpa->config;
> -	struct vhost_iotlb *iotlb = dev->iotlb;
> +	struct vhost_iotlb *iotlb = v->iotlb;
>  	int r = 0;
>  
>  	r = vhost_dev_check_owner(dev);
> @@ -812,12 +812,14 @@ static int vhost_vdpa_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filep)
>  
>  	r = vhost_vdpa_alloc_domain(v);
>  	if (r)
> -		goto err_init_iotlb;
> +		goto err_alloc_domain;

You're still using this:
dev->iotlb = vhost_iotlb_alloc(0, 0);

Shouldn't you use
v->iotlb = host_iotlb_alloc(0, 0);

to set the vdpa device iotlb field?

>  
>  	filep->private_data = v;
>  
>  	return 0;
>  
> +err_alloc_domain:
> +	vhost_vdpa_iotlb_free(v);
>  err_init_iotlb:
>  	vhost_vdpa_cleanup(v);
>  err:
> -- 
> 2.20.1
>