netdev - [PATCH v2 bpf-next] bpf: fix raw_tp test run in preempt kernel

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 29 Sep 2020 17:20:10 -0700
From:   Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>
To:     <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <bpf@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     <kernel-team@...com>, <ast@...nel.org>, <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        <john.fastabend@...il.com>, <kpsingh@...omium.org>,
        Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 bpf-next] bpf: fix raw_tp test run in preempt kernel

In preempt kernel, BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN on raw_tp triggers:

[   35.874974] BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000]
code: new_name/87
[   35.893983] caller is bpf_prog_test_run_raw_tp+0xd4/0x1b0
[   35.900124] CPU: 1 PID: 87 Comm: new_name Not tainted 5.9.0-rc6-g615bd02bf #1
[   35.907358] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996),
BIOS 1.10.2-1ubuntu1 04/01/2014
[   35.916941] Call Trace:
[   35.919660]  dump_stack+0x77/0x9b
[   35.923273]  check_preemption_disabled+0xb4/0xc0
[   35.928376]  bpf_prog_test_run_raw_tp+0xd4/0x1b0
[   35.933872]  ? selinux_bpf+0xd/0x70
[   35.937532]  __do_sys_bpf+0x6bb/0x21e0
[   35.941570]  ? find_held_lock+0x2d/0x90
[   35.945687]  ? vfs_write+0x150/0x220
[   35.949586]  do_syscall_64+0x2d/0x40
[   35.953443]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9

Fix this by calling migrate_disable() before smp_processor_id().

Fixes: 1b4d60ec162f ("bpf: Enable BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN for raw_tracepoint")
Reported-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>

---
Changes v1 => v2:
1. Keep rcu_read_lock/unlock() in original places. (Alexei)
2. Use get_cpu() instead of smp_processor_id(). (Alexei)
---
 net/bpf/test_run.c | 19 ++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/bpf/test_run.c b/net/bpf/test_run.c
index fde5db93507c4..c1c30a9f76f34 100644
--- a/net/bpf/test_run.c
+++ b/net/bpf/test_run.c
@@ -252,9 +252,7 @@ __bpf_prog_test_run_raw_tp(void *data)
 	struct bpf_raw_tp_test_run_info *info = data;
 
 	rcu_read_lock();
-	migrate_disable();
 	info->retval = BPF_PROG_RUN(info->prog, info->ctx);
-	migrate_enable();
 	rcu_read_unlock();
 }
 
@@ -266,6 +264,7 @@ int bpf_prog_test_run_raw_tp(struct bpf_prog *prog,
 	__u32 ctx_size_in = kattr->test.ctx_size_in;
 	struct bpf_raw_tp_test_run_info info;
 	int cpu = kattr->test.cpu, err = 0;
+	int current_cpu;
 
 	/* doesn't support data_in/out, ctx_out, duration, or repeat */
 	if (kattr->test.data_in || kattr->test.data_out ||
@@ -293,27 +292,25 @@ int bpf_prog_test_run_raw_tp(struct bpf_prog *prog,
 
 	info.prog = prog;
 
+	current_cpu = get_cpu();
 	if ((kattr->test.flags & BPF_F_TEST_RUN_ON_CPU) == 0 ||
-	    cpu == smp_processor_id()) {
+	    cpu == current_cpu) {
 		__bpf_prog_test_run_raw_tp(&info);
-	} else {
+	} else if (cpu >= nr_cpu_ids || !cpu_online(cpu)) {
 		/* smp_call_function_single() also checks cpu_online()
 		 * after csd_lock(). However, since cpu is from user
 		 * space, let's do an extra quick check to filter out
 		 * invalid value before smp_call_function_single().
 		 */
-		if (cpu >= nr_cpu_ids || !cpu_online(cpu)) {
 		err = -ENXIO;
-			goto out;
-		}
-
+	} else {
 		err = smp_call_function_single(cpu, __bpf_prog_test_run_raw_tp,
 					       &info, 1);
-		if (err)
-			goto out;
 	}
+	put_cpu();
 
-	if (copy_to_user(&uattr->test.retval, &info.retval, sizeof(u32)))
+	if (!err &&
+	    copy_to_user(&uattr->test.retval, &info.retval, sizeof(u32)))
 		err = -EFAULT;
 
 out:
-- 
2.24.1